Look at the map above and answer the following question.

All of the following EXCEPT ONE reflect the results of John Jay’s Treaty. Which is the EXCEPTION?

Aneli [31]

There was wide spread public protested against John Jay and his treaty- this is an exception.

Option: A

Explanation:

John Jay's treaty was taken for bring the solution of everlasting dispute between America and Britain. In this treaty America was successful to built an economic policy upon which Britain kept faith and a mutual understanding was there in between these two countries.

Though the republican party suffered a lot from this treaty. They felt embarrassed as these two countries never in a a situation of sit together and draw a solution for their own. John Jay's treaty was successful. There was as such no public protest happened.

3 0

3 years ago

5 what was the condition mr. madoff imposed on people marketing his investments? why do you think he did this?

Gnesinka [82]

They were not allowed to list Madoff himself in any marketing materials because he was not registered with the SEC and neither were the ones working under his orders.

He did not want to draw attention to himself because he knew what he was doing was illegal and when attention was eventually drawn, it was not his name on the line because his name wasn't listed anywhere.

7 0

3 years ago

Describe two of the reasons the United States felt compelled to enter World War II.

Leona [35]

Answer:

The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor and Germany's aggression and unrestricted submarine warfare sinking U.S. Ships.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What connection does that Bible story and Dylan's song have with ethics and the so-called "Divine Command Theory" as espoused by

Darina [25.2K]

The connection is that Dylan's song ("Highway 61 Revisited") and "that Bible story" (Abraham sacrificing Isaac) both point to the ethical idea that doing the right thing means doing whatever it is that is divinely commanded.

Explanation/context:

The origins of "Divine Command Theory" stem back to a dialogue written by Plato, which has the philosopher Socrates engaged in discussion with Euthyphro about the meaning of piety or goodness. Socrates was being accused of impiety in Athenian court. Impiety to the Athenians meant conduct that was displeasing to the gods. At that same time, Euthyphro was at court in Athens to prosecute his own father for having killed a servant. Socrates asked the kinds of questions he normally did, pressing Euthyphro how he knew that prosecuting his own father was a good thing. Euthyphro said punishing wrongdoers for wrongdoing was the pious thing to do, no matter who the wrongdoers are. Socrates then asked Euthyphro to how we know what "piety" is -- and Euthyphro said it was doing that which is dear to the gods. That's the "divine command" theory in a nutshell. Bear in mind, as the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro continued, there was much more nuanced thought about how well that definition works. Socrates asked, for instance, "whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods." That became a difficult conundrum for their consideration in the dialogue.

The Abraham story in the Bible follows the "divine command theory" idea. When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac, the fact that God commanded it would make it right, according to divine command theory -- even though the act itself seemed horribly wrong.

Bob Dylan played with that idea in the lyrics to his song, "Highway 61 Revisited," from the album Highway 61 Revisited (1965) ...

Oh, God said to Abraham, "Kill me a son"

Abe said, "Man, you must be puttin' me on"

God said, "No" Abe say, "What?"

God say, "You can do what you want, Abe, but

The next time you see me comin', you better run"

Well, Abe said, "Where d'you want this killin' done?"

God said, "Out on Highway 61"

5 0

3 years ago

Why did Texas suffer see's from the war than other areas of the South?

Sati [7]

In the Civil War, Texas (young Texas) served as a support state, and there was barely any skrimishes in the state. Technically, by the governor's word (The governor at the time was Sam Houston), Texas was originally pro-Union, but the citizens wantes war as a way to assert the state's rights. Also, Texas did not fight for wealthy plantation owners in other states; Texas didn't have any cotton plantations compared to the other Southern states, so they didn't suffer as bad as a loss than the other states. Moreover, during the battles outside of the state, the Texan soldiers either deserted from warfare or joined the Union.

8 0

3 years ago