Answer:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties
Explanation:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties, since they had to share a lot of concepts for the constitution's construction. Jefferson for example, adopted some federalist conceptions when he bought some land that he was offered for the benefit of the country. He did so, even though the constitution was not strictly established or allowed for the purchase of land by the president.
On the other hand, at the same time the federalists adopted a strict constructionist position, arguing that the purchase of land by the president was not allowed by the constitution.
Also Madison, who was considered a federalist, acted according to republicans ideas when he refused to sign a congress project that proposed to destinate some money for the construction of roads, he said that idea was against the constitution and he had to reject it.
That is why, at that moment of politics it was hard to distinguish the ideas of the two parties that had been before so strict, but at that moment everything changed.
Law overtold the wealth of Louisiana which made people<span> go want to buy stock for the </span><span>Mississippi Company</span>
<span>If the sentence you provided is the sentence to correct this would be the correction:
Complete the sentence correctly of a student who wants to be part of the class play.</span>
The rule of law is "The authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior; (hence) the principle whereby all members of a society (including those in government) are considered equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes and processes".[2] The phrase "the rule of law" refers to a political situation, not to any specific legal rule. So under the rule of law nobody is above the law and even the president or the richest American citizen must abide the law.
