1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vichka [17]
3 years ago
14

Read the excerpt from Genesis 47. Joseph came and told Pharaoh, and he said, “My father and my brothers and their flocks and the

ir cattle and all that is theirs, have come from the land of Canaan, and behold,* they are in the land of Goshen.” . . . . And Pharaoh said to his brothers, “What is your occupation*?” And they said to Pharaoh, “Your servants* are shepherds, both we and our forefathers.” And they said to Pharaoh, “We have come to sojourn* in the land, for your servants' flocks have no pasture, for the famine is severe in the land of Canaan. Now, please let your servants dwell in the land of Goshen.” And Pharaoh spoke to Joseph, saying, “Your father and your brothers have come to you. The land of Egypt is [open] before you; in the best of the land settle your father and your brothers. Let them dwell in the land of Goshen, and if you know that there are capable men among them, make them livestock officers over what is mine.” . . . . And Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt in the land of Goshen, and they acquired* property in it, and they were prolific* and multiplied greatly. –Genesis 47:1, 3–6, 27 *behold: look *occupation: job, work *Your servants: we *sojourn: stay *acquired: bought *were prolific: had many children Which lines from the text provide evidence for the central idea that Jacob has made a good decision by going to Egypt? Choose two answers. “behold, they are in the land of Goshen” “Your servants are shepherds” “the famine is severe in the land of Canaan” “in the best of the land settle your father and your brothers” “they were prolific and multiplied greatly”
Social Studies
1 answer:
marta [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D and E

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Original fairy tales like those by teh brother grimm often conatian violence, some literary critics and child psychologists beli
arsen [322]
Having children of my on, I believe that children need to express their fears that way they know early in life, what and what not to be scared or frightened of. It also depends on the limit of violence in the nature of the environment.
5 0
3 years ago
Private foundations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation can be considered humanitarian relief organizations.
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer: Most probably, true, as the foundation would qualify as an NGO, and its mission aligns with that of many other humanitarian relief organizations.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"What about Meg?" 'Meg has it tough,' Charles Wallace said. 'She's not really one thing or the other." What page is this on in t
statuscvo [17]
I believe it’s Page 24 or that’s what it is in my book
3 0
3 years ago
Long answer questions: 1. "We all are Nepali, even though we are diverse in ability, sex, religion, culture and language." Justi
viktelen [127]

Answer:ok

Explanation:INTRODUCTION

Are fundamental rights, the sort of rights entrenched in written constitutions

and human rights instruments, binding on individuals or other private

actors? With few exceptions, most legal systems of the constitutional

democratic type answer this question in the negative. The German Basic

Law, for example, provides in article 1(3) that ‘constitutional rights bind the

legislature, the executive, and the judiciary’ , which means that they bind all

the three standard state powers but not private actors such as individuals,

Direct and Indirect Effects of Fundamental Rights

2

corporations, labor unions and the like. Similarly, the Fourteenth

Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that ‘no State shall

make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of

citizens of the United States’. The U.S. Supreme Court built a notoriously

large and obscure body of case law on top of this seemingly harmless

provision ― the basis of the so-called ‘state action doctrine’ ― the gist of it

being that constitutional rights do not bind private actors unless they are

acting as surrogates of the state or are placed under privileged protection

from it. What it all comes down to is rejection of the view that fundamental

rights normally bind private as well as public actors or that such rights

produce not only ‘vertical’ but ‘horizontal’ effect as well.

But this is hardly the end of the story. Even if fundamental rights

cannot be invoked in private relations ― meaning, for instance, that the

plaintiff cannot base her complaint on the defendant’s violation of a

constitutional entitlement or that the defendant cannot invoke a

constitutional liberty to evade liability ― they are fully operative against the

state in its capacity as law-maker, law-executor and law-enforcer. Imagine

the standard hypothetical of a landlord that sues the tenant for breach of a

term in the lease that placed the latter under an obligation to go to church

every weekend and to decorate the premises with religious paraphernalia.

While the doctrine of vertical effect bars the tenant from invoking freedom of

religion against the landlord, he may do so against the court itself qua

enforcer of the lease and against the legislature qua author of the laws which

empower private parties to create legal obligations inconsistent with freedom

of religion. If the laws in question are indeed unconstitutional, they must be

regarded as void. At the end of the day, the tenant will win the case precisely

as she would if she was allowed to invoke the constitutional right directly

against the landlord. The only difference is procedural: the rejection of

‘horizontal’ effect implies that she must obtain a judicial decision striking

down the law deemed unconstitutional in order to win the dispute against the

landlord. One way or another, the outcome is exactly the same

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identifying who was Abu Bakr and what was his relation to Muhammad
zysi [14]

Answer:

Hazrat Abu Baker has a great name in Islamic history. he was the first man who believed on Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.M).He was a very close friend of the holly Prophet (P.B.U.H). He was also the father in law of the holly Prophet.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the capital of texas
    5·2 answers
  • how did the British government respond when the colonists in Boston became rebellious to their policies?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an instance where the case originates in the Supreme Court?
    11·2 answers
  • Can someone please help ​
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the Qin dynasty’s accomplishments is true?
    11·2 answers
  • Cual era el pensamiento de las personas de la edad media sobre el planeta​
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the last Southern General?
    8·1 answer
  • Platinga’s "A Defense of Religious Exclusivism" 1. What two things does Platinga (Christians) believe that is not shared by othe
    9·1 answer
  • What kills more college-age men and women than all other causes combined?
    5·1 answer
  • How many bones in the metacarpus
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!