Answer:
B. Disparate-impact cases
Explanation:
Disparate-impact treatment is a situation where an employee is treated differently or less favorably because they belong to a protected class such as gender, religion or age.
When an employers policies are not biased but then have a disproportionate impact on such protected groups we call it a disparate-impact case.
Believe it’s was lighting that started the fire
<h2>*<em>Hello there!*~</em></h2>
<em>The question: </em>
<em>From 1990-2004, China's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew at an average rate of 10% each year, higher than any other country in the world. Other than natural resources, China has increased production of electronic and data processing equipment, as well as medical and optical equipment. Which statistic would BEST explain China's ability to improve its economy so much for such a long period of time?</em>
<em>Answer choices:</em>
<em>A) </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>a life expectancy of over 74 years of age
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>B) </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>military spending is 4.3% of GDP each year
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>C) </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>mandatory levels of education and a 91% literacy rate
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>D) </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>people under the age of 15 years are 20% of the population</em>
<em />
<em>The answer: </em>
<em />
<em>A) a life expectancy of over 74 years of age
*</em>
<em />
<em>*Hopes this helps!*~</em>
<em />
<em>Darlington~</em>
Answer:
Asian American
Explanation:
Ascribed status or ascribed identity is involuntary and is the social status of a person that is primarily assigned during birth. This social status cannot be earned or chosen but is assigned or inherited.
Since Laura is born to an Asian American parents, her social status or her ascribed status is also Asian American. She has acquired this status involuntarily. No matter where Laura live or who raised her, since she is an Asian American girl since birth, her ascribed status is Asian American.
Thus the answer is Asian American.
Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
