20. What is the purpose of writing a dissenting opinion?

History

2 answers:

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

First, a judge may write a dissent to persuade the majority, and the dissenting opinion may ultimately become the majority opinion. Second, a dissent can improve the majority opinion by pointing out the majority's mistakes either in its description of the facts, the law, or in its reasoning.

Explanation:

GenaCL600 [577]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

a judge may write a dissent to persuade the majority, and the dissenting opinion may ultimately become the majority opinion. Second, a dissent can improve the majority opinion by pointing out the majority's mistakes either in its description of the facts, the law, or in its reasoning

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which of the following does NOT exemplify an attempt made by the U.S. government to remove imperial control over other nations?

Sphinxa [80]

I would say <span>d.none of the above
All of those were attempts to </span><span>remove imperial control over other nations.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Marshall Plan: Select one: a. provided economic assistance to the Soviets. b. was largely unsuccessful for lack of support f

SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer: C

Explanation: The Marshall Plan(also known as the European Recovery Program), was a United States program providing aid to Western Europe following the devastation of World War II. It was enacted in 1948 and provided more than $15 billion to help finance rebuilding efforts in Europe. In addition to economic redevelopment, a major goal of the Marshall Plan was to halt the spread of communism through the continent.

This was crafted as a four-year plan to reconstruct cities, industries and infrastructure that were damaged during the war, to eradicate trade barriers between European nations and develop trade relationships between those nations and the United States.

6 0

3 years ago

In east asia, one way slaves were acquired was through which of the following

Ronch [10]

Answer:

which of the following...?

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Family and Medical Leave Act (1993) took effect in August 1993 for companies with collective bargaining agreements. For companie

barxatty [35]

Answer:

It's false, because Family and Medical Leave Act (1993) took effect in August 1993 for companies without collective bargaining agreements. For companies with collective bargaining agreements, the law took effect on termination of the labor contract or on February 5, 1994.

7 0

2 years ago

Lady_Fox [76]

C) Marcus Garvey is the answer

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers