All categories

2 years ago

Does anyone like hell ?

Social Studies

2 answers:

den301095 [7]2 years ago

4 0

I needed the points so thanks

Maksim231197 [3]2 years ago

3 0

Explanation:

yeah ...

stay safe healthy and happy.

You might be interested in

According to al-Qaeda, how should laws be imposed?

Radda [10]

Al-Quaeda supports the Shariah law which is a law based on religious beliefs. Usually those who oppose this law are severely punished. The punishment can vary from dismemberment, to decapitation, to stoning someone to death, or similar.

5 0

3 years ago

Which term refers to pro-slavery activists who crossed the kansas border to vote?

frutty [35]

Answer:

Border ruffians

Explanation:

Pro slavery activists who crossed the Kansas Border to vote were called Border Ruffians. They were activists from Missouri, a slave state, from 1854 to 1860 this border ruffians crossed the state border into Kansas Territorial grounds. Their mission was to force Kansas to accept slavery.

They caused violence and interfered in elections and attacked free state settlements. They were part of the cause of the American civil war.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Answer these questions of a culture about your choice

vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

Mexico gets alot of our natural resources from the ocean and underground!

Over the course of the year the temperature rises and falls from 80 degrees fahrenheit to 45 degrees fahrenheit and the temperature rarely falls below 38 degrees.

In Mexico, the two main sports are Football (Soccer) and Boxing. Other popular sports Mexicans do for fun is bull riding, american football and basketball.

Arroz con Leche (rice with milk), Black Beans: served in various different ways, Tamales, Carnitas

New Year's Day, Constitution Day, Benito Juárez's birth, Bueno Friday, Labour Day, Mexican Independence, Dia de Los Muertos, Revolution Day, Christmas Day

The main Language of Mexico is Spanish.

Mexico doesn't seem to have a specific religion. But a lot of Mexicans are Roman- Catholic, I think around 80% of the population is Roman Catholic.

It changed some Mexican beliefs and how people interact.

On the last one I am not very sure

Explanation:

I am using one source for all of this, My experiences

Can I pls, pls, pls have brainiest?? I need 1 brainliest and about 100 points to lvl up!!

4 0

3 years ago

Because of the Roosevelt-Taft feud, Theodore Roosevelt decided to

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

The correct answer is c) break a pledge he had made not to seek another term in office.

Explanation:

Roosevelt, after finishing his second term as the president, made the decision not to appear again for the presidency and decided to go on an expedition to Africa.

After returning from Africa, he finds William Howard Taft as president. He is not satisfied with the policies that William Taft develops, so Roosevelt decides to break his promise not to return to the presidency.

Roosevelt tries to return to the mandate, but it is not easy, he joins the progressive party, and although he did better than Taft, the candidate Woodrow Wilson wins the elections.

I hope this information can help you.

6 0

3 years ago

Isn't it a bit ironic that executives found guilty of criminal activity could serve less time in prison if their firm has develo

lisov135 [29]

Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.

2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.

Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.

8 0

3 years ago

Does anyone like hell ?​

Does anyone like hell ?