I believe that the Egyptians were the first to use the chariot in warfare.
They had invented the yoke saddle for their chariot horses way, way back in 1500. As a common rule, the Egyptians had used their chariots as running archery platforms, and chariots had always had two men, the driver steering the chariot, and the archer directed his arrow fire at any targets that were within general shooting range.
Have a great day! Brainliest is appreciated!
-Pepetreefrogthe2nd
According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.
Good questions to ask are
- How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?
- Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?
- What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?
<h3>What is oral arguments?</h3>
Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.
In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.
Read more about oral arguments
brainly.com/question/15266611
#SPJ1
Amendment 1
- Freedom of Religion, Speech, and the Press
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment 2
- The Right to Bear Arms
A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
Amendment 3
- The Housing of Soldiers
No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment 4
- Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment 5
- Protection of Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property
No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
Amendment 6
- Rights of Accused Persons in Criminal Cases
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Amendment 7
- Rights in Civil Cases
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment 8
- Excessive Bail, Fines, and Punishments Forbidden
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment 9
- Other Rights Kept by the People
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Answer:
Takao Ozawa v. United States(1922)
Explanation:
The case cited above was a situation where the Japanese believed that they were racially discriminated by the United States, a Western country. Ozawa had lived in the United States for twenty years and was now applying for citizenship by naturalization.
His race disqualified him from attaining citizenship because, according to the Supreme Court, he did not fall into the Caucasian race. Ozawa challenged this by describing himself as a "free white person" who was qualified by law to attain citizenship.
Answer: similarly to Lafayette or Mirabeau, Louis XVI believed in moderate way of doing this revolution. Neither Lafayette nor Mirabeau were republicans. Louis XVI was not republican. In contrast to Mirabeau or Lafayette Louis XVI was forced to call for General States (1789) because of problems with state budget (minister of finances Jacques Necker made him to make his made about it, there was no other way). Louis XVI was no republican
Explanation: Louis XVI has no free will already in 1789. He was also under the influence of much more radical right: 1) his wife Marie Antoinette (from Austrian dynasty of Habsburg), 2) his brothers : Louis de Provence, Charles d´Artois, 3) emigration (aristocracy that already during 1789, 1790 escaped to Rhineland, especially to Koblenz). When he tried to escape, he was caught with all his family in Varennes, and then executed (January 1793).
