Answer:
an inverse,
Explanation:
Inverse relationship refers to a situation when two variables will always go to the opposite direction. Let's say that there are variable A and variable B. In an inverse relationship, when the amount of Variable A increase, the amount of of Variable B will decrease.
This is what happen within relationship between price and quantity of goods purchased.
When the price of the product increased, there will be Less people who can afford it and choose to find substitute product. This will lead to lesser demand and a decrease in total quantity of goods purchased.
It is because the British have taken the India by an sailor and slowly they tAke away India and all are allow to be servant of British . But when they go back India has nothing and away all then people realised that British are now rich and want to be rich by going foreign countries by speaking English
Answer:
<em>0.964 or 96.4 %</em>
Explanation:
Hemoglobin is the red component of the red blood cell, it combines with oxygen to keep the body functional. The fractional saturation of hemoglobin is usually computed graphically but the hill equation gives a more specific value.
Calculations:
The hill equation can be expressed as;

Where
is the fractional saturation of oxygen =?;
is the partial pressure of oxygen = 72 mm Hg;
is the partial pressure of oxygen when the hemoglobin is 50%
saturated = 24 mm Hg and;
h is the Hill coefficient = 3.
Substituting the values into the expression above we have;

= 
= 
= 0.964
Therefore the fractional saturation is 0.964 or 96.4 %(multiply by 100)
B. slums
<span>Industrialisation affected the poor in a way that they, as manual labors, were replaced by machinery in order to do the tasks or jobs that were usually done manually. During industrialisation, agricultural society was replaced to a manufacturing one. Because of this, there was a lower demand for workers as many lost their jobs because of machinations. Due to the higher demand for jobs by these people, many of the poor people accepted jobs with low wages to compete for those others who are also in need of jobs. </span>
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question so I had to look for it. Anyway, the answer would be TRUE. Based on the given scenario above about Paul, the decision that he is having is an example of an Ethical dilemma. Hope this helps.