Answer:
By communication with the natives whom gave them food and hints to survive. They however ended up killing them and making them sick.
Yes, progress occurs when the people govern and the little clique that dominated the nation must disappear because they ruled to benefit themselves, not the country or its residents.
If people control a nation, good progress occurs in every sector, leading to the country's and its people's development.
This is further explained below.
<h3>Describe a development that was the product “of a widespread sense that the people should rule and that government by traditional elites had come to an end.”?</h3>
Generally, The reign of a small number of elites over a nation must come to an end in order for the nation to experience true progress. This is due to the fact that the small group of elites only governed for their own gain, and not for the good of the nation or its population.
In conclusion, If there is a rule of people in the nation, then good growth will occur in every sector, which will contribute to the development of both the people and the country.
Read more about development
brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ1
<span>The consolidation of work and profit became one of the primary ways in which people and business were impacted through the Industrial Revolution. Factories helped to consolidate workforces and the development of products. The consolidation of profit happened when more products could be created for greater profit. The consequence of urbanization followed the factory process, consolidating a workforce into one concentrated area and allowing factory owners a greater pool from which to employ and enhance their profits and the production of their factories.</span>
Northerners believed that abolition was the way to go because they thought people should not be treated like property and toil like slaves. All people were equal in their eyes, so they decided to treat people like that, especially Quakers and abolitionists.
Southerners, while there may have some abolition supporters (possibly), thought differently. They believed abolitionists were trying to take their sources of hard labor in the South: slaves. Southern slave masters wanted slaves to work for almost no pay and do the work they didn't want to do, so aboiliton was NOT something they really liked...
