1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sveta_85 [38]
2 years ago
7

do you think it is impossible to control the magnetic properties of a magnet ? Can a magnet be turned on and off ?

History
2 answers:
sp2606 [1]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

you can not turn a magnet off or on

Explanation:

ipn [44]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation: magnets can be turned off

You might be interested in
Which of the following documents was most influential in the creation of the Bill of Rights?
ira [324]

Answer: A

Explanation:It just is a          

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was Manifest Destiny a positive or negative event? Choose a position and defend it.
kow [346]
Manifest destiny was a positive event. Manifest destiny was a cultural belief that said American settlers were destined to expand across North America. This expansion was really good for the country and it’s people. It increased goods and doubled the land area of the us.it was also a big improvement for trade and industry. It opened more trade routes which enhanced barter.
3 0
3 years ago
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the belief that it was gods plan for the us to expand across the continent
KatRina [158]
It is probably westward expansion because that is what the time was called. The divine right meant that god gave the king the “right” to rule a country, so that isn’t an option.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of an economic sanction?
Harlamova29_29 [7]
Economic sanctions directly impact the economy of the subjects country. Therefore a trade ban would be an economic sanction. 1 and 4 would be damaging to diplomatic relations but not the economy and 3 is military intervention which is not solely an economic action.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Does anyone know why Alexander the great died like what happened
    8·1 answer
  • The students in the May Fourth Intellectual Movement rejected classical written Chinese in favor of a new vernacular Chinese cal
    14·2 answers
  • The government of the united states in 1786 was organized around the
    7·1 answer
  • How was President Eisenhower's brinkmanship a change from the foreign policy of Truman?
    5·1 answer
  • Image your the judge, how is your role in government different from an elected official?
    7·1 answer
  • Someone needs to write me a poem about, president Roosevelt's death. the first gets the brainliest!
    5·2 answers
  • An international conference in this city called for a reduction in CFC emissions worldwide.
    9·2 answers
  • Historians consider this long Last journal to be a breakthrough in their understanding of the Byzantium empire based on this inf
    14·1 answer
  • The nucleus is the part of the atom that
    14·2 answers
  • Who was the 6th president of the usa?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!