Answer:
B. No one can live a full or happy life if they are denied freedom.
Explanation:
The theme of "Sympathy" is that "No one can live a full or happy life if they are denied freedom"
The statement that best summarizes the appeal of pathos is option D)Numerous industries pollute the environment with no repercussions.
<h3>What is pathos?</h3>
Pathos is a literary device that authors use to cause a great emotional impact on the reader.
In an essay about the necessity of stopping pollution and littering, the statement that has the biggest emotional impact on the reader is option D) Numerous industries pollute the environment with no repercussions.
Since we can see that it is not only one industry, but several and nothing is being done about it. It addresses a bigger part of the problem.
<h3>Incorrect options</h3>
- Options A and B only address one of the topics, either littering or pollution, so they do not summarize the appeal of pathos since they lack impact.
- Option C does not address the necessity of stoping pollution and littering, it is stating something about the topic that makes us feel good, but it lacks impact and does not show the necessity of stopping pollution and littering.
You can learn more about pathos here:
brainly.com/question/827240
Answer: पर्यावरण पर प्रवासन के दो प्रमुख प्रभाव जीएचजी उत्सर्जन में इसका योगदान है, और इसलिए जलवायु परिवर्तन, और 'आमीनता', 'आनंद' या 'लाभ', जो प्राकृतिक पर्यावरण के पहलुओं द्वारा प्रदान किया गया है कई लोगों द्वारा मूल्य के होते देखा जाता है, और जो उम्मीद की जा सकती है कि ये एक अद्भुत क्रिसमस की पूर्व संध्या है!!!!!!!❄️❄️❄️
Explanation:
Answer: One listener interrupts the speaker by inserting an opinion.
Explanation:
In order for a successful group discussion to take place, it is important that all of the students listen to each other. Everyone's opinion must be taken into consideration, and everyone should be given a chance to express it. However, if the students interrupt each other while speaking, the speaker then cannot make his point clear and convey his idea. In this light, the action that would be the most disruptive to the discussion is - One listener interrupts the speaker by inserting an opinion. Of course, it is not appropriate to laugh at the opinion presented by another student either, but at least the student is not interrupted in the middle of his speech.
