1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hram777 [196]
3 years ago
8

Do you think objects should have been removed from the wreck of the TitanicWhy do you think humans have a desire to explore the

world, and in particular, dangerous places like the deep sea
History
1 answer:
Nataliya [291]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Well, this is for your opinion of course but I can tell you my opinion.

Explanation:

I think they should have taken artifacts out of the ship because they could have made exhibits cooler with furniture and décor from the real ship. I think people like to explore to see what's out there, plain and simple. I mean, sometimes it's for money but I think we all sometimes have a desire to see what is in our world, to discover new things. I hope this helps. Please no plagiarism.

You might be interested in
In the 1920's and 1930's some Americans used this statement to justify a policy of
blsea [12.9K]
I'm pretty sure the answer is B, isolationism.
7 0
3 years ago
Rodger Williams was in favor of which of the following principles of the US government
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

depends on what the principles were:|

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Those who opposed giving the federal government more power than the states were known as what? federalists anti-federalists stat
sattari [20]
Those who opposed giving the federal government more power than the states were known as the "Anti-Federalists", since they did not want to ratify the Constitution, which would have done this. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Iran's Shah was a big ally of the United States.
ololo11 [35]
Please develop your question more
6 0
3 years ago
What happen during the time know as Pax Romana?
Lena [83]
The Pax Romana was said to be a peaceful time of prosperity in Rome. But was all of it really peaceful? No, although Rome wasn't fighting any wars, they still had internal struggle as an empire. After the Civil Wars, Rome went through 27BC-180AD, which is a 200-year period called the Pax Romana, which means peace. The Pax Romana lasted from 27 BC until 180 AD. It started when Augustus Caesar was Emperor (ruler) of the Roman Empire. The main good things that happened in this time were: There were not many wars. Pax Romana which is Latin for "Roman Peace" was a time, as the name suggests, a long period of peace and minimal military expansion from 27 BC to about 180 AD. The main importance was that all of the land surrounding the Mediterranean was at peace because everyone was under Roman Law.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • From this lesson, the Vietnamese Tran dynasty is known for _____.
    13·2 answers
  • What influential pamphlet condemned the system of monarchy?
    14·1 answer
  • Suppose the United States government said that you were no longer allowed to be an American because of a group that you belonged
    11·1 answer
  • The division of the US government into three branches is called
    14·2 answers
  • Why might women have received the vote in the western states before state legislatures were willing to pass voting rights for wo
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Britain and France call of their invasion of Egypt
    12·1 answer
  • Please help I’m stuck
    12·1 answer
  • After WWII began, Jewish people were taken into custody and placed where? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • How does the scale of the First World War compare to that of the Second World War,
    10·2 answers
  • Who did the Vietcong view as oppressors?​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!