Pluralistic ignorance is most closely related to<u> Uncertainty condition</u> for social proof.
<h3>What is Pluralistic Ignorance?</h3>
Pluralistic ignorance is a significant cognitive fallacy that all individuals, some more than others, experience. It is the mistaken belief that one's thoughts or values are different than the perceived thoughts of the majority.
Pluralistic ignorance is connected to social norms and other aspects of public behavior. It is evidenced by situations in which individuals have one or more beliefs, values, or priorities that they believe differ from those of the rest of the members of the group.
When everyone in the group is uncertain and looking around for clues to appropriate behavior, the result can sometimes lead to "pluralistic ignorance."
Pluralistic ignorance occurs when individuals infer that the identical actions of the self and others reflect different internal stress.
<u>Three steps to pluralistic ignorance:</u>
- People self-censor. They do not always express their true thoughts and feelings for fear of embarrassment/rejection
- People incorrectly conclude others are expressing their true feelings and thoughts, even though they are censoring
- People conclude their own thoughts/feelings are not shared by others
Learn more about Pluralistic Ignorance on:
brainly.com/question/25735916
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ang pagtingin sa isang pelikula nang kritiko at maingat na nangangahulugang upang mapagtanto ang sinehan na may higit na pag-iisip at kamalayan, at upang maiangat ang isang karanasan sa celluloid. Nangangahulugan din ito ng pagkakaroon ng isang kaalamang kaalaman tungkol sa kumplikado at siksik na 'wika ng pelikula,' ang mga kombensyon, code, simbolo, cinematic na katangian, at iba pang mga kadahilanan.
When Rome declined, the western half of the empire formed the Byzantine Empire. The eastern half became the Holy Roman Empire. Because the Byzantine Empire came from the fall of the Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire had many similarities with Rome. In addition to these similarities, there were also several differences between these two empires. This includes culture, religion, and location. These similarities and differences helped shape the Byzantine Empire into what it became.
One similarity between these two Empires was the form of entertainment that took place in these cultures. Both the Byzantine Empire and the Roman Empire enjoyed watching gladiator fights at a big stadium. (Rautman) The people of the Roman Empire held these events at the Coliseum. In the Byzantine Empire, there was the Circus Maximus, another stadium. The use of this arena was the same as the Coliseum in Rome. Gladiator fights and chariot races were held here. It is estimated that 50,000 to 350,000 people, or approximately a quarter of the population of the city could fit inside. It has also been calculated that the arena of the Coliseum would fit 12 times into the Circus Maximus. (Crowther)
A difference between the Byzantine and Roman Empire was their form of religion. (Salisbury)In Rome the people worshipped Jupiter as the father of all gods. Jupiter and his wife Juno had many children that were also gods. For example, Mars, the god of war was a child of Jupiter. Mercury, the messenger god was another son of Jupiter and his wife. This meant that Rome was a polytheistic society. They believed in more than one god. The Byzantine Empire, on the other hand, was a monotheistic society. This meant that they believed in only one god. They mainly followed the teachings of Christianity. (Ermatinger)
In conclusion, the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire were unique in their own was. Both civilizations rose out of fallen cultures. While the Roman Empire rose from the Roman Republic, the Byzantine Empire was established because of the fall of the Roman Empire. Despite these differences, the two cultures had similar aspects in culture, geography, science and technology. Some of these included government, religion, and location. These characteristics helped develop the two great civilizations and influence the world today.
Answer:
A. the Clayton Act.
Explanation:
The source of today's antitrust laws is the Sherman Act, the American Antitrust Law of July 2, 1890, supplemented later by the Clayton Act of 1914, and the Law that created the Federal Trade Commission the same year, the american antitrust agency.
Some authors claim that the Sherman Act was designed to protect the market itself, which would be self-destructing due to excessive economic freedom. It is even argued that the American antitrust law represented a supposed salvation from liberalism, which, without regulation, would give rise to monopolistic concentrations that distorted the natural rules of competition.
