The relationship between Wilma and the seller is called a sub-agent relationship
<h3>
What is a sub-agent relationship?</h3>
A sub-agent relationship happens when the agent or broker brings a buyer to purchase a property from him whereaS he is not the property's listing agent.
In conclusion, the relationship between Wilma and the seller is called a sub-agent relationship
Read more about sub-agent
<em>brainly.com/question/25325640</em>
Here, we are decide the best option between making the part or buying the part.
a. Make or Buy Analysis
Particulars Make amount Buy amount
Direct Materials $4.50
Direct Labor $1.00
Overhead (80% of Direct Labor) $0.80
Cost to buy <u> </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost per unit <u>$5.70 </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost Difference = $5.70 - $4.70
Cost Difference = $1.00
Therefore, the cost difference of making amount over buying amount is $1.00.
b. Because of the difference, Beto should buy the part because its cost is lesser than to make the part.
Therefore, the buying of the part is the best decision.
See similar solution about Analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/23287319</em>
Answer:
$24,000
Explanation:
Since in the question it is provided that there is a sale value of the videos to its customers i.e. $24,000 also the collection is of $22,000 and the remaining balance i.e. $2,000 is expected to collect in Jan 2020
Based on the above information, the revenue should be reported on the income statement at the $24,000 as this amount represent the sale value of the videos to its customers and hence, the same is to be considered
Hence, 24,000 would be reported as a revenue in the income statement
Answer:
B) Tom's statements provide grounds to set the contract aside.
Explanation:
When we are talking about setting a contract aside, it means that the contract is voidable. A voidable contract is valid until one of the parts decides to void it. In this case, if Victoria decides to purchase Tom's car and later discovers that he lied about the price, she can void the contract and return the car to get her money back.
What Tom is doing is basically lying about the material facts of the product that they are bargaining and it represents a valid reason for voiding the contract.