1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ss7ja [257]
3 years ago
8

Organizations also create conferences and summits, where industry professionals and educators can come together to discuss innov

ations,
ideas, services, and other resources.
True
false
History
1 answer:
Bumek [7]3 years ago
8 0

the correct answer is true, hope this helps anyone who is taking the same dumb class as i am

You might be interested in
The Continental Congress had what
Yuri [45]

Answer:

the continental army

Explanation:

HA

8 0
2 years ago
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
The Federalists argued that the economy was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. Which can you infer was part of their
liraira [26]
Trade was almost impossible since states printed their own money
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What caused the Jamestown settlers and the Powhatan Confederacy to go to war?
FrozenT [24]
The upperclass were being captured by the native americans and so they eventually went to war
5 0
3 years ago
What did Europeans bring to the new world that caused the deaths of millions of native Americans
maks197457 [2]

Diseases. To list some would be influenza, smallpox, etc.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I, it was __________.
    6·1 answer
  • In plessy v. ferguson (1896), the u.s. supreme court established the general principle that
    11·1 answer
  • "We have been driven to the conclusion that only through legislation can any improvement be effected, and that that legislation
    11·1 answer
  • Confucianism was first favored by state officials during the______dynasty??
    5·2 answers
  • What were some of the major reform movements of the 19th and 20th centuries?
    12·1 answer
  • What brought about the Japanese and the United States of America fought war in 1941​
    12·1 answer
  • President roosevelt's new deal both help and hurt american farmers? How effective was the new deal in aiding american farmers?
    7·1 answer
  • • What forms did slavery take in West Africa?
    10·1 answer
  • Because i made a remake of a very funny dograve video and i just want to share it with the world
    6·2 answers
  • Which element of the Compromise of 1850 was most supported in the North?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!