In a split offering, we see that a) shares are issued from the corporation and sold by existing shareholders.
<h3>What is a split offering?</h3>
A split offering is a type of stock issuance that involves the issuing of new stock and existing stock that it is in the market already. This is why it is called a split offering - one side of the offering comes from the corporation, and the other comes from the existing shareholders.
With a split offering, the seller will be existing shareholders and not the company. This means that the corporation that issues the shares, will then cooperate with existing shareholders who will then be the ones to sell the shares.
Find out more on stock offerings at brainly.com/question/13049425.
#SPJ1
Markets are segmented as <span>behavioral, demographic, geographic, and psychographic. The crescent should be targeting the geographic segment
Hope this helps :))</span>
Answer:
It will be demanded more or used more because as we advance in technology more people will start to use these new electronics so many people with get their eyesight ruined by the constant blue light their eyes are receiving which will lead to people getting laser eye surgery to fix their damaged eyes.
Explanation:
Answer:
$870
Explanation:
When a company makes sales on account, debit accounts receivable and credit sales. Based on assessment, some or all of the receivables may be uncollectible.
To account for this, debit bad debit expense and credit allowance for doubtful debt. Should the debt become uncollectible (i.e go bad), debit allowance for doubtful debt and credit accounts receivable.
Allowance for uncollectible accounts at 5%
= 5% * $302,000
= $1,510
Since the Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts was $640 (credit) before any adjustments, the bad debt expense for the year
= $1,510 - $640
= $870
Answer:
Monopolist can charge a higher price from women.
Explanation:
A monopolist is producing 100,000 units of a product.
The price of the product is $5 per unit.
The price elasticity of demand for men at this price is -3.5.
The price elasticity for women, on the other hand, is -0.8.
This means that the men have a relatively elastic demand for the product. While on the other hand, women have relatively inelastic demand. This implies that if the price is increased the demand from women will not change by a greater proportion.
While demand from men can change to a greater proportion because of a change in price.
In this situation, the firm can charge a higher price from women. This is an example of third-degree price discrimination.
