Answer:
Landless Southern farmers became very rich.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:The notion of political independence covers the nonmaterial elements of State sovereignty and power, namely the freedom of political decision-making and the direction of State organs in respect of the internal and international affairs of a State.
Answer:
the Revised Uniform Partnership Act
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in the question, should a dispute arise, regarding the operations of Liana and Tara, the courts will look to The Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) to resolve the issues
the Revised Uniform Partnership Act is a model statute that dictates how partnerships should be set up and organized, as well as what the rights and duties of each of the partners should be. It is, as the name suggests, a revision of the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA), and has been adopted by almost every state.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
