Answer:
Uhhh get it i guess
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-6x+3÷x+1
Step-by-step explanation:
2x^3-3x^2-5x+3÷x+1
2x ×2x ×2x-3x +3x-5x+3÷x+1
8x-9x-5x+3÷x+1
8x-14x+3÷x+1
-6x+3÷x+1
Answer:
dm
Step-by-step explanation:
A square's diagonal cuts across the square, making two right triangles where the diagonal is the hypotenuse.
We have a right triangle with a hypotenuse of 29, and two legs that are the same length (because they are sides of a square)
So, we can use pythagoreans theorem to find the lengths of the legs, or sides of the square.
Now that we have a side length of 
, we just have to multiply that by 4, since a square has 4 sides. This leaves us with a final perimeter of:
Answer:
The scientist’s conclusion is not appropriate because it is based on a subjective appreciation (“significantly greater than”).
<em>How “greater” is “significantly greater”?
</em>
A more objective and technical approach would be fixing a level of significance, let's say 0.05 or 0.01 for example, measuring the samples means and standard deviations and then proceeding with an appropriate hypothesis testing in order to see if the differences in means are really significant.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Kilogram of chicken = 1
Kilogram of tilapia = 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost of chicken = 150 per kilo
Cost of tilapia = 100 per kilo
Number of kilos of each if total cost should not exceed 450
Let :
Number of kilo of chicken = x
Number of tilapia kilo = y
The constraint :
150x + 100y ≤ 450
We could choose some reasonable values of x and y then, test the constraint ;
If x = 1 and y = 3
150(1) + 100(3) = 450
Hence,
1 kilo of chicken with 3 kilos of tilapia offers the greatest combination of Number of kilograms of tilapia and chicken that could be purchased and still satisfy the maximum cost constraint.
