1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna1 [17]
3 years ago
6

What was to be added for the Anti-Federalists to ratify

Law
2 answers:
yanalaym [24]3 years ago
8 0
They wanted a Bill of Rights. They wanted this because they feared the federal government may become too powerful without it.
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
4 0
Your mom house naps Manama with
You might be interested in
What is the mission of the NJROTC program?
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

The purpose of NJROTC is "to install in Cadets the value of citizenship, service to the United States, personal responsibility, and a sense of accomplishment."

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true regarding the privileges and immunities clause of the U.S. Constitution?A. Under the clause, a st
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

C. Under the clause, states may not discriminate against citizens of other states in the buying and selling of property.

Explanation:

The Privileges and Immunities clause is found in Article IV of the United States Constitution and it prevents the states to treat in a discriminatory manner to citizens of other states. It also does not contain a market participation exception so, when the State acts as a supplier like in the case of selling or buying properties according to this clause it is forbidden to discriminate non-residents.

I hope this answer helps you.

3 0
4 years ago
A woman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. The crime scene was processed and inve
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case of ________, the Supreme Court gave the lower courts some discretion over how they applied the test for qualified im
asambeis [7]

Answer:

Pearson v. Callahan

Explanation:

This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.

Hope this Helps!

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a contract, each party has what?
tester [92]
A. I think I’m not sure though
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • michael josephson Its a sign of troubled times when the concept of pressure becomes an acceptable excuse for ethical shortcuts a
    6·1 answer
  • 2. Relatively few drivers are touched by the
    14·1 answer
  • Who owns the rights to sell Cadbury in the US? Why is this a conflict now?
    10·2 answers
  • The principle that the rules of a legal system apply equally to all persons, institutions, and entities—public or private—that m
    15·1 answer
  • What are the six methods for lighting an actor? These are in your Lighting Design notes.
    8·1 answer
  • Essential Questions: How do interest groups/lobbyists support the legislative process? Does the role that interest groups play r
    9·1 answer
  • 3. How does the Criminal Justice and Forensic Science Reform Act propose to combat the problems with
    6·1 answer
  • Answer the questions below to test your knowledge regarding the roles of the prosecution and the defense.
    8·1 answer
  • The use of turn signals as a signal to the driver of other vehicles that it is safe to pass is:
    8·1 answer
  • What was Preston Tucker's dream?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!