Answer:
they can get anberst or get sad or may happy
Explanation:
b/c they think that they always need to proof in studies alyes thin they can do more
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Answer: Option (A)
Explanation:
A batholith can be described as the large horde of the intrusive the igneous rock which are also referred to as the plutonic rock, that are known to be larger than the 100 square km in dimension, these are mostly formed from the cooled magma deep that resides in the Earth's core. These igneous rocks are mostly made up of intermediate or felsic rock types , i.e. quartz monzonite.
Answer:
Philosophers and scientists don't have a moral obligation to work together; they should do so because it makes their respective work more interesting to pursue.
Explanation:
In the holistic kinesiology approach outlined in the text, philosophers and scientists have a moral obligation to work together so that works would have a purpose.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.