Answer:
- 'Slippery slope.'
Explanation:
'Slippery slope' is demonstrated as the argument that is logically flawed as it offers a very small or minor event leading to a chain of major and significant events that often creates a ludicrous effect.
As per the question, the given argument could be characterized as 'slippery slope' as a very minor first step 'Passing a law to permit active voluntary euthanasia' would lead to extensive consequences 'abuses..more frequent use of non voluntary euthanasia and unnecessary killing'. Such an argument fails to ignore the possibility of upcoming consequences(due to the use of a small action leading to a significant effect) that creates an incongruity in the argument.
Three main factors that determine poverty are Race/ethnicity, geographic location, and household type. Option D. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
poverty ?</h3>
Generally, A person is said to be living in poverty when they do not have the standard or socially acceptable quantity of money or material goods. When individuals do not have the resources necessary to meet their fundamental requirements, we speak of them as being poor.
When an individual or group does not have access to the financial resources and basic necessities necessary to maintain a minimal level of life, they are said to be impoverished. When a person's income from work is so low that they are unable to meet their most fundamental necessities, they are said to be living in poverty.
In conclusion, Race or ethnicity, geographic region, and the kind of home people live in are the three primary elements that influence poverty. The D Option
Read more about poverty
brainly.com/question/10850821
#SPJ1
<span>Lowell is still in the shock stage which is Catherine Sanders's first stage of grief of four. Once he is aware of the loss and recognizes that she has passed then he can move on to the second stage which is awareness of loss.</span>
Even though you forgot to provide your question with some options I have some ideas how to sort it out. So, if smart car is involved in a head on collision with an suv it means that this situation is an example of Newton's third law, when both forces are equal. I'm sure it will help you it some measure, but next time check it more careful.
