Answer:
$82,400
Explanation:
Cost of goods sold = beginning merchandise inventory + purchases - ending merchandise inventory.
$69,200 = $15,600 + purchases - $28,800
Purchases = $82,400
Answer:
A) It is subtracted from the Bonds Payable balance and shown with long-term liabilities on the balance sheet
Explanation:
The discount on Bonds payable, as their name implies, decrease the Bonds Payable carrying value. A bond with discounts, was issued at a lower price than his face value. The discount on bonds represent that difference.
It takes amortization while the time past, until at maturity, their balance is zero, to represent the reality, the obligation for the company is for the face value, so the carrying value of bonds payable should equal the face value.
Last, because the bonds are due in ten-year their place is the long-term liabilities. As their obligation are not within the 12 month period to qualify as short-term
Answer:
$8,119,048
Explanation:
Given that,
Amount of scholarships = $170,500 per year
Trust fund earns an annual rate of return = 2.1 percent
Let x be the amount contribute to the fund and assuming that only income is distributed,
2.1% of x = Amount of scholarships
0.021x = $170,500
x = $170,500 ÷ 0.021
= $8,119,048
Therefore, the amount of money that is contributed by the George Jefferson to the trust is $8,119,048.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": absolute advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute Advantage is an individual company, or country's ability to produce a good or service at a lower cost than any competitor. An organization with an absolute advantage requires fewer inputs or more efficient processes that allows the firm to lower prices and earn higher profits compared to its rivals.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
