1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masya89 [10]
3 years ago
11

Given America's economic interests in the Middle East, do you agree with the decision to quickly recognize the newly declared st

ate of Israel? Why or why not?​
History
1 answer:
VMariaS [17]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

Given America's economic interests in the Middle East, I don't agree with the decision to quickly recognize the newly declared state of Israel.

The issue is so complex and we can trace Palestine-Hebrew conflicts and battles back to the Old Testament times.

It is true that not only the United States, but other countries such as Great Britain have many political and economic interests in the Middle East region, basically, oil.

However, the occupied territories have always belonged to the Arabs, to Palestine. It was England, with the support of the United States, that forced Palestines to accept the Jerusalem territories to establish Israel. And that has created more conflicts, like the recent armed aggression between Palestine and Israel.

The issues that are currently related to the Arab-Israeli conflict are "The settlement of the west bank" and "the Israeli blockade on the Gaza Strip."

Unfortunately, the Middle East is the most conflictive region in the world. One of the main sources for these conflicts is the severe differences and problems between Israel and Palestine. These confrontations are permanent and have generated too much violence.

The main source of the Arab-Israeli conflict in the Middle East is the creation of the State of Israel, which displaced the Palestinian majority.

With the support of the United States, Great Britain, and the United Nations, the state of Israel was established on May 14, 1948. The reaction of the Arab nations was immediate with a series of attacks and conflicts to protests the decision. United States President Harry S. Truman was the first one to recognize the state of Israel moments after the declaration.

You might be interested in
How did détente affect relations between the Soviet Union and the United States?
Travka [436]

increased trade and cooperation with the US

4 0
3 years ago
Why might the olmec have carved their leaders' heads in colossal size?
lesya [120]
They wanted to present them as if they were gods. This was quite common in history and is a reason for example why pharaohs got pyramids built in their honor. The giant heads depicted their leaders as gods or someone who is in general larger than life itself. It was a sign of respect and others who would visit would also see this and know who they are dealing with. Such heads can still be found and examined which is important when trying to understand their ancient culture.
6 0
3 years ago
Which policy did Manuel de Mier y Tehran recommend to the Mexican government
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

Law of April 6, 1830.

Explanation:

Manuel de Mier y Teran was a Mexican General who issued a report to the government in 1829. In his report, he initialized that slavery should be prohibited and this policy also called to close the borders to forbid any Americans come into the borders of Texas.

He outlined many recommendations in his report, of which many recommendations were adopted into the law under the Law of April 6, 1830. The laws were passed under the Presidentship of Anastasio Bustamante.

Therefore, the correct answer is Law of April 6, 1830.

4 0
3 years ago
Which ones goes with which?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

I am positive that what you have selected in the picture is correct.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz help I will report if you give me nonsense answers and this is just a warning
Lelu [443]

I think its A. I'm not entirely sure but it does seem most logical.

<u>Anyways a big reason that these powers are limited is to keep society in a stable place. Tyranny brought onto any civilization over the years has led to its downfall. This balance helps keep both the government and its people under equal terms. </u>

Its not B. because this would allow tyrant rulers to keep their position putting everyone else at a disadvantage to please themselves. This simply doesn't make sense if you were to limit the government.

C. isn't a possibility either because each government only governs over said region.

D. can also be justified under my response to B. since it has the same meaning yet is worded differently/ or relates to more modern leaders I suppose.

Anyways, I hope I was helpful and good luck :D

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which ancient poet is credited with telling the story of the trogan war
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?
    12·2 answers
  • Which two countries were in conflict because they both tried to settle in the Upper Ohio River Valley?
    5·1 answer
  • Unlike Britain, France, and Russia, the United States
    14·2 answers
  • Who first discovered planet earth and on what date ?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME IDK HOW TO PUT THIS THANK YOU!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Investigations revealed that the September 11 attacks were the work of
    12·2 answers
  • What role did alliances play in starting world war 1?
    15·1 answer
  • Which feature of the United States government is also found in the magna carta?​
    10·1 answer
  • Who was named the president of the Confederate States of America?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!