Answer:
R is a better alternative because it has a higher NPV than Q.
Explanation:
Machines Q R
First costs $380,000 $395,000
Net annual revenue $150,000 in year 1, $152,500
increasing by $500
per year thereafter
Salvage value $4,000 0
Life, years 8 10
MACRS 7 year recovery:
year % Q R
1 14.29% 54,302 56,445.50
2 24.49% 93,062 96,735.50
3 17.49% 66,462 69,085.50
4 12.49% 47,462 49,335.50
5 8.93% 33,934 35,273.50
6 8.92% 33,896 35,234.00
7 8.93% 33,934 35,273.50
8 4.46% 16,948 17,617.00
net cash flow
year Q R
1 116,505.70 118,880.93
2 130,396.70 132,982.43
3 121,411.70 123,304.93
4 115,086.70 116,392.43
5 110,676.90 111,470.73
6 110,930.10 111,456.90
7 111,326.90 111,470.73
8 108,306.80 105,290.95
9 99,125
10 99,125
Using a financial calculator, I calculated the NPV using a 12% discount rate:
- Q's NPV = $200,636.15
- R's NPV = $259,221.01
The deadweight loss is $90.6.
<h3>How to calculate the loss?</h3>
The study suggested that the average recipient's valuation of the gift received was approximately 90% of the actual purchase price of the gift.
This means there's a loss of 10% in value constitute the deadweight loss.
Average amount spent on gift = $906
Percentage loss in value = 10% or 0.10
Calculate the deadweight loss -
= Average amount spent on gifts * Percentage loss in value
DWL = $906 * 0.10
The deadweight loss would be $90.6.
Learn more about dead weight loss on:
brainly.com/question/15415492
#SPJ1
A study by university of minnesota economist, joel waldfogel, estimated the difference in the actual monetary value of gifts received and how much the recipients would have been willing to pay to buy them on their own. the study suggested that the average recipient’s valuation was approximately 90% of the actual purchase price.
Calculate the deadweight loss if the average amount is $906.
Answer:
heck no I'm definitely not writing that for you. ur lazy.
The amount by which the total benefits to consumers exceed their total expenditure is called
consumer surplus, and if the price is b, is depicted by the area <span>
BCD</span>.
My response is based on this figure which I've attached.
Answer:
Sustainable growth rate = 0.67148%
The firm maintains a constant ratio of liabilities to equity.
Explanation:
Sustainable growth rate = ROE *Plow back Ratio / (1-ROE * Plow back Ratio)
When ROE = Net Income / Total Assets
= $2,000,000/$300,000,000
= 0.00667
Plow back Ratio = 1 - (Dividend / Net Income)
= 1 - ($180,000/$2,000,000)
= 1 - 0.09
=0.91
Sustainable growth rate = ROE * Plow back Ratio / (1-ROE * Plow back Ratio)
= 0.00667 * 0.91 / (1 - 0.00667 * 0.91)
= 0.0060697 / 0.9039303
=0.0067148
= 0.67148%
Therefore, the sustainable growth rate is 0.67148%
The firm maintains a constant ratio of liabilities to equity is the correct assumption for the sustainable growth model.
