Answer:
Explanation:
There are primarily two types of costs, i.e. variable costs and the fixed costs. The variable cost is the cost which changes when the level of production changes, whereas the fixed cost is the cost which remains constant whether the level of output changes or not.
The variable costs also include indirect products, indirect labor and manufacturing equipment, and the fixed costs include taxes and depreciation costs.
The period cost is that cost which is related to the selling and admin expenses plus it is not capitalized.
Whereas the product cost is a mix of direct labor, direct material and the manufacturing overhead
So, the categorization is shown below:
1. Hamburger buns in a Wendy's outlet. = variable and product cost
2. Advertising by a dental office. = Fixed and period cost
3. Apples processed and canned by Del Monte. = variable and product cost
4. Shipping canned apples from a Del Monte plant to customers. = variable and period cost
5. Insurance on a Bausch & Lomb factory producing contact lenses. = fixed and product cost
6. Insurance on IBM's corporate headquarters.= fixed and period cost
This is to ensure that they complete the project within the
appointed period of time as well as within the budget given to them. It also shows how effective the government is
in implementing their projects. If they
don’t do so within the period and the budget then people will question their
efficiency in completing their assignments and project within the period
prescribed.
I think it is grey with blue tinsel charts... 86/56
Answer:
101.12 million
Explanation:
<em>The present value of a future cash flow is the amount that can be invested today at a particular rate for a certain number of years to have the future cash flow </em>
The present value of the liability
= FV × (1+r)^(-n)
= 800 × (1.09)^(-24)
= 101.12 million
The present value of this liability= 101.12 million
The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct