Answer:
<h3>Jericho and Catal Huyuk are important sites for historians and researchers as it helps us understand ancient urban establishments.</h3>
Explanation:
- Both Jericho and Catal Huyuk are important sites for historians and researchers as it helps us understand ancient urban establishments.
- Jericho is believed to have been established around 14,000 years ago in the West Bank of the Middle East. It is an ancient city which still exists today. The city was confined to its territory and did not look towards outward expansion.
- Similarly, Catal Huyuk was an ancient town situated in modern day Turkey. It is believed to have been established around 6500 to 5700 BC where one of the earliest human settlements took place. It was an early neolithic town with about 1000 houses.
- Jericho and Catal Huyuk are important ancient sites however neither became sites for civilizations because they did not expand like other civilizations.
Answer:
The correct answer is c) Deadlines for implementation of corrective actions.
Explanation:
Companies or institutions usually make an improvement plan for the benefit of projects; this plan is obtained after a set of steps in which the actions and goals that are to be achieved are identified.
After the completion of the improvement plan, the deadlines for the implementation of corrective actions to systematically comply with the process and seeking the best benefit for the institution are decided.
<em />
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
it actually depends. it is mostly eaten in the south but there are some select places in the world where people it soup beans.
The answer is social class. The caste system of India is an example of a social class characteristic of a civilization.The Hindu caste system has been in the society where the religion and rituals are the most important to the Hindus.
Answer:
b. Ha: # of bugs with the new pesticide = # of bugs with the old pesticide
Explanation:
As seen in the question above, the new insecticide may have better results than the old insecticide that David used in his garden. To find out if this is true, David decides to spray one side of the Garden with the new insecticide and spray the other side of the garden with the old insecticide, so that he can count which of the two insecticides killed more insects and thus determine which of the products is more efficient.
To determine efficiency, David's chances are:
- # of bugs with the new pesticide < # of bugs with the old pesticide
- # of bugs with the new pesticide > # of bugs with the old pesticide
However, it is necessary to consider an alternative hypothesis, where the evaluation of the results is null. Thus, the alternative hypothesis for David's experiment is:
- # of bugs with the new pesticide = # of bugs with the old pesticide
