Answer:
3. Foreign Direct Investment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question in regards to the situation at hand, it seems that the theme park company is using a global marketing strategy called Foreign Direct Investment. This term refers to when a foreign company decides to invest in a controlling ownership of a business in another country. Just like what is going on with the theme park company wanting to buy land in Frollik in order to build an entertainment park.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The recency effect occurs when a rater gives greater weight to information received first when appraising an individual's performance is a true statement.
<h3>What does recency effect refer to?</h3>
The recency effect is a memory phenomena where individuals tend to accurately recall information that is most recent. It is a cognitive bias whereby the last things, concepts, or arguments are remembered more vividly than the initial ones. The recency effect, in contrast to the primacy effect, is the propensity for people to more readily recall items that are presented last in a list. This is probably because those items were the most recent and are still stored in your short-term memory in the case of the recency effect.
To learn more about recency effect, visit:
brainly.com/question/8653544
#SPJ4
Answer:
the expected return is 10.9%
Explanation:
The computation of the expected return is shown below:
= expected return × weightage
= 0.16 × 0.35 + 0.15 × 0.10 + 0.12 × 0.15 + 0.05 × 0.40
= 0.056 + 0.015 + 0.018 + 0.020
= 10.9%
Hence, the expected return is 10.9%
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
Sales 2,050
Costs (1,400)
Depreciation <u>(250)</u>
EBIT 400
Interest expense <u> (70)</u>
Earnings before tax 330
Tax @ 25% <u>(82.50)</u>
After-tax operating income <u>247.50</u>
Explanation:
The after-tax operating income equals sales minus costs minus depreciation minus interest expense minus tax.
Answer:
a. $8 million
Explanation:
In the given situation, the $8 million is the best price to finalize your decision as $20 million costs is that cost which is paid last year and these costs are called sunk cost which is not recovered in the future, that means it is already incurred in the past.
Moreover, the sunk cost is not a part of the future decision as this cost is irrelevant now
So, $8 million is a relevant cost to make a better decision
