1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GarryVolchara [31]
3 years ago
13

In a slow year, Deutsche Burgers will produce 2.8 million hamburgers at a total cost of $3.4 million. In a good year, it can pro

duce 4.8 million hamburgers at a total cost of $4.6 million.a. What are the fixed costs of hamburger production
Business
1 answer:
lorasvet [3.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the fixed cost is $1.72 million  

Explanation:

The computation of the fixed cost is shown below:

= Total cost - variable cost

= $3.4 million - ($4.6 million - $3.4 million) ÷ $3.4 million - $.1.2 million ÷ $2 million

= $3.4 million - 2.8 million × $0.60 million

= $1.72 million

Hence, the fixed cost is $1.72 million  

You might be interested in
"In a new margin account, a customer buys 1,000 shares of ABC stock at $40 per share. The stock rises to $45 during the next wee
laiz [17]

Answer: SMA Balance $40000

Explanation:

the Special Memorandum Account(SMA) Balance will remain at $40000 (1000 x $40). The SMA Balance does not decrease when the market value of the security decrease

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge cola producers a tax. Before the tax, 50 billion cases of cola were sold ever
Georgia [21]

Answer:

U.S. Tax Burden on Cola:

The amount of the tax on a case of cola is $4 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case, and the burden that falls on producers is ___$3______ per case.

The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.

a. True

b. False

Explanation:

The tax burden on consumers, which is represented by the difference in the price of cola from $5 to $6 per unit is $1 ($6 - $5).  However, the cash received by producers reduced by $3 from $5  to $2.  This shows that the total tax burden on both consumers and producers is $4 ($1 + $3).

This represents a total tax burden of $4 or about 67% based on the new selling price of cola or 80% based on the old selling price of cola.

"The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers alone.   This because the price of cola would have increased to $9 per unit.  Since the demand for cola in this instance is elastic, this change in price would have caused a more than 80% change in the quantity demanded.

4 0
3 years ago
All sources of income is also known as which of the following
mariarad [96]
It is name nontaxiable
6 0
3 years ago
The following are selected 2017 transactions of Sean Astin Corporation.
Vadim26 [7]

Answer and Explanation:

The Journal entries are shown below:-

A. a. Purchase Dr, $50,000

           To Accounts payable $50,000

(Being purchase of inventory is recorded)

b.Accounts payable Dr, $50,000

            To Notes payable $50,000

(Being issuance of notes is recorded)

c.Cash Dr, $50,000

  Discount on notes payable Dr, $4,000

             To Notes payable $54,000

(Being amount borrowed from bank and issued notes is recorded)

B. a. Interest expenses Dr, $1,000 ($50,000 × 8% × 3 ÷ 12)

            To Interest payable $1,000

(Being interest expenses is recorded)

b. Interest expenses Dr, $1,000 ($4,000 × 3 ÷ 12)

                 To Discount on notes payable $1,000

(Being interest expenses is recorded)

C. The Computation of interest-bearing note and the zero-interest-bearing note is shown below:-

Interest-bearing note = Note payable + Interest payable

= $50,000 + $1,000

= $51,000

Zero-interest-bearing note = Note payable - Discount

= $54,000 - ($4,000 - $1,000)

= $54,000 - $3,000

= $51,000

8 0
3 years ago
What is the effect on real GDP of a ​$150 billion change in planned investment if the MPC is ​0.65? ​$ nothing billion. ​(Enter
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer and Explanation:

The computation of the effect on real GDP is shown below:

change in GDP is

= Multiplier × change in investment

= 1 ÷ (1 - MPC) × change in investment

= 1 ÷ (1 - 0.65) × $150 billion

= 2  × $150 billion

= $300 billion

And, the marginal propensity to consume is

= Change in spending of consumer ÷ income change

= (2,100 - 1,200) ÷ (4,000 - 3,000)

= 900 ÷ 1,000

= 0.9

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the big six foodborne illness
    15·1 answer
  • "Profit-sharing plans provide a more direct incentive in small firms than in large firms. are practically impossible to use succ
    6·2 answers
  • During 2016, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. had Sales of $3,563.3 million, Gross profit of $1,634.6 million and Selling, general, and adm
    9·1 answer
  • The net income reported on the income statement for the current year was $250,000. Depreciation recorded on fixed assets and amo
    12·1 answer
  • The firm uses the periodic system and there are 20 units of the commodity on hand at the end of the year. What is the amount of
    6·1 answer
  • Assume that you have been hired by a large international bank that is looking to develop a smartphone app to help college studen
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between federal and private loans.
    6·1 answer
  • Denials can occur as a result of errors that occur at various points in the revenue cycle. Identify at least one error that can
    8·1 answer
  • Like other corporations, market sales corporation can extend its operations through:_______
    14·1 answer
  • A label on foods prepared and packaged onsite for retail sales must list which information?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!