1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
10

Lets say Sam is babysitting dogs for 15 dollars and cleaning her house for 20 to save up 600 dollars, how many weeks/months woul

d she have to work
Mathematics
2 answers:
Rus_ich [418]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I believe that it's 3 weeks

satela [25.4K]3 years ago
7 0
Does he get that amount every day?
You might be interested in
Rory is staying in a cabin on a hill 300 feet above sea level. She walks down the hill to the water’s edge. The equation of her
Anastasy [175]

For this problem, we plug in the <em>numbers for t</em> and the <em>appropriate letters for e</em> to the equation <em>e = 300 - 10t</em>.

a) a = 300 - 10(-2)

simplify: a = 300 + 20

simplify: a = 320 ft.

But, this is not a viable point because when t≤0, she doesn't move anywhere, thus, should consistently be 300 ft.

b) b = 300 - 10(3.5)

simplify: b = 300 - 35

simplify: b = 265 ft.

c) c = 300 - 10(30)

simplify: c = 300 - 300

simplify: c = 0 ft.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Nineteen immigrants to the U.S. were asked how many years, to the nearest year, they have lived in the U.S. The data are as foll
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

a) The frequency of the data "<em>15</em>" and "<em>20</em>" is 2 for both, not 1; this means their relative frequency is 2/19 for both, not 1/19; finally, the cumulative relative frequency in the row of the data "15" should be 0.8947, not 0.8421. This error might have happened because someone didn't count the numbers correctly, so they only noticed one "15" and one "20" when, in fact, there were two people that had lived in the U.S. for 15 years, and two more people for 20 years. On the other hand, the error in the cumulative relative frequency happened because it accounted for only one person living in the U.S. for 15 years, instead of two people.

b) Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. from 0 to 5 years, <em>not </em>for 5 years. The cumulative relative frequency in this row (47%) accounts for every data gathered so far, not just the "5 years" row. The correct statement would be that <em>3 out of 19</em>, or 15.8% (relative frequency) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) First of all, to avoid errors like the one in the problem's table, <em>we should first place the given numbers from least to greatest</em>, so we can construct a new frequency table by ourselves. Let's do just that, and we'll end up with something like this:

0 , 0, 2 , 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 10, 10, 12, 12 , 15, 15, 20, 20

Now we'll have a much easier time from now on.

2) The second step is to <em>construct the Data and Frequency columns</em>. Just place each unique integer in a new row of the <em>Data </em>column, then count how many times that unique integer was found, and, finally, place that number below the <em>Frequency </em>column (<em>Please refer to the Excel Worksheet provided as an attachment). </em>

Let's do it as follows:

Data     Frequency

0            2

2            3

4            1

5            3

7            2

10           2

12           2

15           2

20          2

<em>Note that we counted "15" and "20" twice! So each one of those rows have a frequency of 2, not 1 as the table presented in the problem suggests. </em>

3) Next, we want to construct the Relative frequency and Cumulative relative frequency columns. For the relative frequency column, <em>we just divide the frequency of each row by the total number of immigrants surveyed, which is 19</em>. For the cumulative relative frequency column, <em>we will get each row's relative frequency, and add the cumulative relative frequency of the row before it</em>. Note that for the first row, the cumulative relative frequency is the same as its relative frequency.

We should get something like this:

Data    Frequency    Relative frequency    Cumulative relative frequency

0            2                   2/19                               0.1053

2            3                   3/19                               0.2632

4            1                    1/19                                0.3158

5            3                   3/19                               0.4737

7            2                   2/19                               0.5789

10           2                   2/19                               0.6842

12           2                   2/19                               0.7895

15           2                   2/19                               0.8947

20          2                   2/19                               1.0000

<em>Note that the relative frequency for both "15" and "20" is 2/19 instead of 1/19! Also, we got a cumulative relative frequency of 0.8947 in the row of "15", instead of 0.8421.</em>

4) a) We have just fixed the error in the table, but we have to <em>explain how someone might have arrived at the incorrect number(s)</em>. The most logical way that someone might have gotten the incorrect frequencies of "15" and "20" is that <em>they didn't count the numbers correctly while building the Frequency column</em>. This could have happened because <em>that person probably didn't order the numbers from least to greatest</em>, as we did in Step 1, which makes it way easier to get the frequency of each data without making a mistake.

5) b) We have now to <em>explain what is wrong with the statement "47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years</em>.

To answer that, we can refer to the relative frequency of the row of the data "5", which tells us that 3 out of 19 (or roughly 15.8%) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years. <em>Relative frequency is telling us the percentage of people that have lived for </em><em>this </em><em>amount of time.</em>

By contrast, <em>the cumulative relative frequency of this same row tells us that </em>0.4737, or roughly 47%, of the people surveyed have lived for 5 years or less. Cumulative relative frequency accounts for the data presented in its row, <em>plus </em>the data presented in the rows before it.

So the correct statement would be either:

  • 15.8% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years, or
  • Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years or less.
Download xlsx
7 0
4 years ago
What percent is equivalent to 12/25<br><br> A: 12%<br> B: 13%<br> C: 24%<br> D: 48%
andrezito [222]

Answer:

48 percent!

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS help will gift 20 extra point for the first to answer it
Sonja [21]

Answer:

No, his inference is not valid

Step-by-step explanation:

the data shown represents the statistic of 100 people's preferred ways to view movies in total

out of that 30/100 people prefer to watch in theatre.

trent inferences that out of 400 people 300 would prefer to watch in theatre another way to write this is 300/400

if we multiply the data we're given so that the denominators match Trent's inference. The data tells us that 120/400 would prefer to watch in theatre, so his inference is not valid.

4 0
3 years ago
10. 14. A new DVD player has a purchase price of $430. With the extended warranty, the total cost is
sergejj [24]
Subtract 430 and 512 and turn into a percent
82%
Than 430+512is942
Divide by 82%is11.487804
Skip a few times until u reach 11.48
Add 4+8 and then dvd:1 dvd to buy
So 4+8is12 plus 11 is 23 and one dvd it’s 24
So the answe is 24%
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mario and Luigi want to purchase some extra controllers for their friends.each controller costs 29.99. Use an algebraic expressi
    12·2 answers
  • The monthly salaries of a sample of 100 employees were rounded to the nearest ten dollars. they ranged from a low of $1,040 to a
    7·1 answer
  • Find the zero(s) of this function: y=x^2-17x+52
    14·2 answers
  • Which phrase best defines a rhombus?
    11·1 answer
  • Find the slope of x=2y
    5·2 answers
  • I need help with this math problem!
    11·2 answers
  • Graph (x-4)^2/4 + y^2/9 = 1
    12·2 answers
  • A coin is flipped 60 times and lands on heads 36 times. Based on the experimental probability, how many heads would you predict
    9·2 answers
  • Use the Remainder Theorem to find f(c).<br> f(x) = 5x5 + 2x3 - 5x2 - 3<br> C = 1
    12·1 answer
  • Chioe stops for lunch in a town that
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!