Answer:
arc price elasticity = -1.64
Explanation:
arc price elasticity = (change in quantity x average price) / (change in price x average quantity)
- change in quantity = 7,400 - 10,000 = -2,600 units
- average price = ($2.50 + $3) / 2 = $2.75
- change in price = $3 - $2.50 = $0.50
- average quantity = (10,000 + 7,400) / 2 = 8,700 units
arc price elasticity = (-2,600 x $2.75) / ($0.50 x 8,700) = -7,150 / 4,350 = -1.64
Answer:
a. True
b. True
c. True
d. False
e. True
f. False
g. False
Explanation:
There are two countries which are about to enter into the free trade. Under the free trade circumstances the Home country will produce timber but it does not completely specializes in producing the timber. The labor is mobile factor which can move in the free trade therefore they will move towards their employability in the TV industry.
Answer:
re write to (after high school i would follow my dreams and seek my future to become knows as a real estate agent and would love to become one good salary and a wealth living for my future family) -there you go add more if its not enough
Explanation:
The increase in transactions caused by inflation is the correct response when it comes to the shoe leather cost effect on inflation. Therefore, choice 3 is right.
<h3>What is the cost of shoe leather?</h3>
When there is significant inflation, the shoe leather cost refers to the time and effort people spend holding less cash in order to lower the inflation tax they must pay on their cash holdings.
The extra time and convenience that must be given up to keep less money on hand than would be necessary if there were less or no inflation is a substantial cost of reducing money holdings.
In light of the cost effect of inflation on shoe leather, option 3 is thus right.
Learn more about shoe-leather costs:
brainly.com/question/22260794
#SPJ1
Answer:
Carter Co. has greater financial risk as compared to Sunny Co. and to the average financial risk in the industry.
Explanation:
Since the industry average is 3.20
Provided Debt to Equity is
Sunny Co. 4.00
Carter Co. 6.00
Since debt to equity represents the financial risk associated with the product.
It is clear that both the companies are on a higher financial risk than that of the industry.
Further the company is still in a better position than that of the competitor, as the later has higher debt to equity ratio.
Therefore, the first statement concluding that the financial risk of Carter Co. is highest of all including the competitor and the industry average is True.
