Answer: can you separate the category's from the labels so i know how to match them please?
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is- genetic predisposition
Explanation:
The correct question should be "twin studies suggest that a strong influence on emotional instability comes from____"
Twin studies suggest that a strong influence on emotional instability comes from <u>genetic predisposition.</u>
Twin studies are studies which are conducted on identical or fraternal twins and they aim to reveal the importance of environmental and genetic influences for trait phenotypes and disorders.
Genetic predisposition is an increased likelihood of developing a particular disease or trait based on a person's genetic makeup. It results from specific genetic variations which are often inherited from a parent. It influences possible phenotypic development of an individual organism within a species or population under the influence of environmental conditions.
Therefore a strong influence on emotional instability in twins come from genetic predisposition
The correct answer is C) China currently holds trillions in US debt.
<em>The reason might the US for treating China differently is that China currently holds trillions in US debt.</em>
US foreign policy frequently encourages nations of the world to adopt democratic forms of government with similar human right standards. The reason might the US for treating China differently is that China currently holds trillions in US debt.
Until January 2019, the United States debt to China was $1.13 trillion. China has the most United States debt held by a foreign country. That represents a disadvantage to the US finances, and if we added the trade war that both countries are into, the situation for the US can get more complex. So that is why the United States needs to have some concessions with China. The reason might the US for treating China differently is that China currently holds trillions in US debt.
Answer:
d. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
The<u> statement "d" best describes the internal coherence of a hypothesis </u>because if the different parts of a hypothesis aren't coherent with each other, aren't related, there's no internal coherence in the first place. All the different parts have to have a rational relationship, have to be rational with each other.
