Answer:
A lease for a period of 24 months.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings. Legal practitioners are saddled with the legal responsibility of listening to evidence and give a verdict about legal cases.
A lease for a period of 24 months must be in writing between the lessor (landlord) and the lessee (tenant) to be enforceable by a competent court of law.
Hence, the landlord of a property has the right by law to receive agreed upon rent and to evict tenants when their rent expires.
1606 divided by 7
| < Calculate the approximate value
= 229.42857
1606
——— , 229 3/7
7
Answer:
"He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people."
"For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent."
Explanation:
Answer:
Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.
Explanation:
Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.
