Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
The power be exercised in a reasonable manner. The provisions be clear and specific. Freedom from discrimination P.S. I got an A on this
Hopes this helps my loves :)
$504000 is the actual return
<u>Explanation:</u>
particulars calculation Amount
Service cost 700000
Interest cost 
480000
Less: Expected return 
576000
Prior service cost 48000
Net loss 30000
Pension expense 682000
Therefore, the pension expense is $682000
<u>The computation is as follows for the calculation of return (in $000’s)
</u>
<u>Plan assets
</u>
Beginning = $5760
Actual return = ?
Cash contributions = 696
Less: Retireee benefits = (624)
Ending balance = $6336
Thus after solving this, we get the actual return that is equal to = $504,000
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
Answer:
Break even sales will be $2700
So option (b) will be correct option
Explanation:
We have given fixed cost = $1400
Sells per unit = $27 each
And variable cost per unit = $13 each
So contribution margin ratio 
We know that break even sales is given by
Break even sales 
So option (b) will be correct answer
Answer:
C. Sleeping in late and waking up early.
Explanation:
Two or more events are said to be mutually exclusive if and only if they can't happen at the same time.
Going with the above brief analysis, we.can easily say which of the pair of events is not mutually exclusive.
1. Rolling a 4 on a six-sided die and on a four-sided die
It's 100% possible to have an outcome of 4 when a 4 sided die and when a 6 sided die are rolled, whether at the same time or on different occasions. So, this pair of events are not mutually exclusive
2. Making rice and making corn
This pair of events are not mutually exclusive because it's possible to make rice and corn at the same time either together as a meal or separately using different cooking utensils
3. Sleeping in late and waking up early
This pair of events are mutually exclusive. This is so because literally, it's not possible to sleep late and wake up early at the same time.
You sleep early to wake early and you sleep late to wake late.
4. Going to work and riding the bus.
This pair of events are not mutually exclusive because they can occur at the same time when you go to work a bus.
So, option C is the correct answer
