Answer:
a) Chimel vs. California
Explanation:
The Chimel vs California case was a result of police officers going to Chimel's home with a warrant that authorized his arrest for burglary. After the warrant was served, the police officers comprehensively searched the house of Chimel. The search revealed various items that were used as exhibit to convict Chimel. The State Courts upheld Chimel's conviction. However the Supreme Court in a 6-2 decision, did not find the search of the full house reasonable, as a search warrant would be needed for this cause.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. He helped negotiate peace <span>agreements between Israeli and PLO leaders. C. He helped bring about a stock-market surge, low unemployment, minimal inflation, and general prosperity. D. He supported a welfare reform billed that increased the number of people receiving welfare."</span>
A letter to the manager of the electricity company:
To
The Manager,
ABC Power Company
Subject: Letter to compliant about regular power cut in the South Delhi, New Friends Colony.
Respected Sir,
This is to inform you that I am a residence of New Friends Colony, South Colony and I want to draw your kind attention towards our colony problem. Our colony is facing the problem of regular power cut in this heating summers which causing the routine life of the residents of this colony.
It is my humble request you to pay your attention on this problem and resolve it with the immediate action.
Faithfully
X.Y.Z
Im sorry i didn't get here sooner idk if you need the answer or not but if u never got the answer <span>it shaped life because the social pyramid gave ranks for all the people again i'm so sorry for being late </span>
