1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liraira [26]
3 years ago
5

During the 1925 scopes trial those opposed to the teaching of evolution in schools

History
2 answers:
Airida [17]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer is  .............C
Scorpion4ik [409]3 years ago
4 0

<u>The Scopes Trial</u>, commonly referred to as the Scopes Evolution Trial or the Scopes Monkey trial, <u>began on July 10th, 1925</u>.  

The defendant, <u><em>John Thomas Scopes</em></u>, was a high school coach and substitute teacher who <u><em>had been charged with violating the Butler Act by teaching the theory of evolution in his classes</em></u>.  

<u>The Butler Act forbid the teaching of any theory that denied the biblical story of Creationism</u>. By teaching that man had descended from apes, the theory of evolution, Scopes was charged with breaking the law.

<u>The correct answer is: "C":</u> opposed the teaching of non biblical content.

You might be interested in
What development occurred as part of the second industrial revolution in the late 1800s?
SSSSS [86.1K]
The correct option is B.
The second industrial revolution occurred between 1870 and 1914. During this period, there was massive advancement in technology and in factories and this made it possible for manufacturers to produce a lot of goods en mass. The industrial revolution started in Britain and rapidly spread to Europe and North America an then to the rest of the world.
6 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
How was the geography of Crush in 400 BCE important to its economy
Ratling [72]
To me I thought it was a savanna  because to me it sounds as if it was in Africa so yea I'm going to say it was a savanna.
7 0
3 years ago
What are the formal and informal ways the constitution has changed over time?
olga2289 [7]
Article V creates a two-stage process for amending the Constitution:proposal and ratification. An amendment can be proposed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress or... By two-thirds of state legislatures requesting Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments. 
8 0
3 years ago
Explain why there is conflict about whether Hinduism is monotheistic or polytheistic.
Alenkasestr [34]

Answer:coz people have no other work .....

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1-2 paragraphs explain how the first people came into North America and where did they settle.
    10·1 answer
  • Work of building such things as roads, schools, and
    8·1 answer
  • Where did early human beings originate and what are some of their technological and artistic achievements?
    13·1 answer
  • What was true about African Americans in the military?
    15·2 answers
  • The Department of Homeland Security was created to
    13·1 answer
  • which technological feat of Rome was most impressive or most historically significant? Why (answer in 4-6 sentences) please i re
    5·1 answer
  • 20. Why did France, a Catholic country, help the Protestants during the Thirty Years' War?
    8·1 answer
  • The new world offered to many europeans the opportunity to gain what 3 things?
    10·2 answers
  • The table show the statistics for three professional
    14·1 answer
  • Charlemgne was important because he:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!