Answer:
Cuando rechazamos la hipótesis nula, esperaríamos que la razón de varianza, a largo plazo, sea: <u>mayor al valor crítico.</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is "Principal of marginal analysis".
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine unless the benefits of even an aggressive resource would outweigh its costs, and therefore increase utility, individuals and businesses can use a valuation model to compare the risks versus the benefits of more activities, like whether to create or consuming more. It's the amount during which net value is greater than or equal to marginal cost that's the optimal quantity in this situation. The amount where the marginal social cost curve and consumer surplus line connect.
Given situation: Jack crawled 3ft and Christine crawled ¾ the distance of jack crawled.
Question: Find the total distance that Jack and Christine crawled.
Solutions:
=> 3 feet
=> ¾ of Jack’s distance.
Get the ¾ value of 3 feet.
=> ¾ = .75
=> 3 * .75 = 2.25
The distance that Christine crawled is 2.25
Let’s add to get the total distance they crawled.
=> 3 + 2.25
=> 5.25 total distance they crawled.
Answer:
i think its multiplication property of equality
Step-by-step explanation:
19 + n = 30
19 + n - 19 = 30 - 19
n = 11
I think the answer is 126.6466666666667but rounded be 126.65