<span>Among the choices, the one that describes an advantage oral history has over written history is C, Oral history can engage and entertain listeners by using music, rhythm, and poetry. They aren't considered primary sources because they can be changed as time goes on, depending on the storyteller.</span>
I would go with realism bc the definition of it is: the attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly.
I hope this helps you :) also, if you could choose two answers I would go with intellectualism too
Answer:
lead to Bargazan resigning which left only Khomeini in power.
Cancel culture hasn't taken a huge effect on history other than "canceling" figures such as Christopher Columbus. Multiple monuments have been toppled or graffitied on that represent the dark spots in history, such as confederate leaders, colonizers, etc. Though the context in history books have not changed as much. Removing history from the books is no the responsibility of cancel culture. Cancel culture could be a possible threat to learning true history and how we came to be. We must learn true history to not make the same mistakes we did in the past. History will repeat itself.
