The preposition in question is "on", and its purpose is to show you where the dog chewed. You can remove the preposition to form the sentence "The brown dog chewed the rawhide bone." You can also rearrange it to find the preposition, "on the rawhide bone, the dog chewed" in what is commonly known as the Yoda technique.
The passage used a combination of comparison and contrast and: <span> C. cause and effect.
</span>The passage give us a well descriptive explanation on how the microorganisms (the cause) developed in such a way to the point where their fossils ended up as a petroleum/coal (effect)
Answer:
On his second day in the camp, Salva notices a woman in an orange scarf who might be his own mother. ... Even after all the horror he's lived through, Salva wants to believe that his mother is still alive. He hopes for the best—and, Park implies, his hope gives him the strength he needs to survive in war-torn Sudan.
Explanation:
Answer:
The basis of this argument is that verbs are conjugated only in the present and past tense. If we want to refer to the future, we have to use the auxiliary verb will, or the be going to phrase followed by the verb in present or past, or the present tense. Since in English, there is no change in the conjugation of the verbs for the future, some linguistics claim that there are two tenses (past and present) while others claim that there are three because we form the future tense with the addition of the auxiliary or use present simple or continuous.
Explanation:
Linguistics such as Quicker Al claims that there are two tenses, present, and past since they are expressed by inflections in their verbs, while future does not have inflections. There is no future tense, but there is future time. Time is related to our perception of reality, making the future subjective. On the other side, tense expresses when an action happens, taking into account the moment that the person is speaking. Linguistics such as Hatav or Klein claims three tenses' existence, past, present, and future. They state that we can refer to the future with the addition of the auxiliary verb will, or the phrase be going to, or the use of present simple, or continuous even though there is no specific inflection in the verb, as it happens in other languages like Portuguese or Spanish. They identify the future with the definition of tense.
Answer:
Before the rain; the clouds turned dark gray.
Explanation:
For it to be properly worded<em>, </em>it would be <em>" Before the rain, the clouds turned dark gray " </em><em>or </em><em>" The clouds turned dark gray </em><em>before </em><em>the rain ". </em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em>p.s. </em>
<em>the other answer explains it a bit clearer, showing to remove the " ; "</em>
