The Hawthorne studies showed that:_______

In business, managers and employees are faced with many decisions. Management writer Ken Blanchard and religious leader Norman V

QveST [7]

Answer: In order to answer this, we must first add the options. They are as follows:

A. Am I acting fairly?

B. Is it balanced?

C. How will it make me feel about myself?

D. Will it help me further my career?

E. Is it legal?

The correct option is D. Will it help me further my career. This is a question that should NOT be asked when facing an ethical dilemma.

Explanation:

Ethics are moral principal that guide one's actions and attitudes. Now, all the options above can be properly weighed using ethical standards.

An Ethical dilemma is a situation in which a choice must be made between two options, neither of which will resolve the situation in an ethically acceptable manner.

We will analyze the options one after the other.

Let us start with option A. Am I acting fairly?

When faced with an ethical dilemma, one good question to ask is if an individual is acting fairly, that is, are they acting according to accepted ethical standards? If one's actions go contrary to ethics, then they should probably not undertake such an action. Therefore, this question SHOULD BE ASKED.

Option B. Is it balanced?

Balance here talks about equality. In this case this question looks at whether the action will favour one party over another, or if it will favour everyone equally. Therefore, this question SHOULD BE ASKED.

Option C. How will it make me feel about myself?

This question looks at the after effect of an action, if the action will make you feel good or bad about yourself later on. If the action will make you feel good, then it should be undertaken, but if it will make you feel bad, it should not be undertaken. Therefore, this question SHOULD BE ASKED.

Option D. Will it help me further my career? (Correct option)

This is a wrong question to ask when experiencing an ethical dilemma because it is not a question about ethics or morals, only career advancement, and it does not focus on the right or wrong of an action. Also, this is a selfish question to ask and it does not take into consideration the effect that the action will have on others. This question should therefore, NOT BE ASKED, because it is not a proper reflection of one's ethics.

Option E. Is it legal?

This question looks at the legality of an action, therefore illegal actions should not be undertaken, while legal actions should be pursued. This is a question that SHOULD BE ASKED.

6 0

3 years ago

Jones Company possesses a 25 percent interest in the outstanding voting shares of Sandridge Company. Under what circumstances mi

coldgirl [10]

Answer:

Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.

Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:

+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;

+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.

+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Briefly discuss Sherif’s (1966) classic study of boys at summer camp in terms of findings and implications for understanding com

Serhud [2]

Sherif’s (1966) classic Robbers Cave study of boys at summer camp finds the relationship between the two groups of boys immediately deteriorated when the event began.

In the 1940s and 1950s, social psychologist Muzafer Sherif and his associates conducted a number of investigations, including the Robbers Cave experiment. Sherif investigated the interactions between male groups at summer camps and a competitor group with the hypothesis that "when two groups have competing purposes... their members would become antagonistic to one other even when the groups are constituted of normal well-adjusted individuals at a summer camp " The Robbers Cave study found the incident swiftly escalated once the parties started throwing jabs. The Sherif discovered that the summer camps' surveys, in which they were asked to score their own team and the opposing team on good and bad attributes, contained questions about group animosity.

Learn more about Sherif here:

brainly.com/question/14407858

#SPJ9

5 0

1 year ago

Who on here can drive and lives in Florida?

iragen [17]

Answer: aye im 15 i can drive and no i dont live in florida

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Organizations using a matrix structure Multiple Choice

kherson [118]

Answer:

D. contain multiple overlapping command structures, in which all employees report to three or more managers.

Explanation: Matrix structure is a type of organisational structure used by some companies to accomplish some projects where juniors/subordinates engaged in the project will have to report to two bosses like the process owner and the project manager,in matrix their is an interlinked reporting pattern where a particular subordinate reports two or more bosses.

the main disadvantage of this structure is the problem of authority where subordinates may not be able to know who and how to report some issues.

7 0

3 years ago

The Hawthorne studies showed that:________