Answer:
This is an example of causal reasoning.
Explanation:
It is an example of causal reasoning because the statement is relating two facts as if one would be the cause of the other. In this case, being bald is the cause, and the effect is a heart attack. The flaw in this reasoning is that there is not enough evidence to prove that baldness can increase the risk of heart attacks. That is something that science has to investigate to check that this statement is not a fallacy of false cause.
A medical transcriptionist is needed to transcribe doctor's notes and if this information is not completed correctly, it can interfere with tests and/or treatments ordered that may seriously harm or kill the patient. Also, there could be a concern of the billing being off and the patient being charged more if the transcriptionist submits to the billing department the incorrect information.
Answer:
Evaluating her pulmonary hypertension and scheduling her for a sleep study was the correct procedure, however the clinic should test her for peripheral edema too.
Explanation:
If a patient has a cronic ilness as pulmonary hypertension, she must be tested for peripheral edema to avoid another complications such as pulmonary embolism. She arrived at the clinic showing lower extremity swelling.
Even though she had an echocardiogram, the physicians should dig a little deaper and investigate her heart condition as well.
Otherwise, she wil have a blockage of an artery in the lungs and have shortness of breath, chest pain, which leads to coughin up blood , fast heart rate and sudden death.
The simple fact that her swelling was solved by diuretics, do not mean she is out of danger.
Wrestling because you work both your strength by lifting other opponents and cardio because of resistance.
