Answer:
Casual Claim
Explanation:
Dr Ramos makes a casual claim here. Casual claims are based causal relationships or cause and effect variables such that x is the cause and y is the effect of x the cause. Casual claims are based on casual assumptions called a casual model. Dr Ramos is able to establish here that television which is the x variable here leads people to less communication, the y variable.
Answer:
Are there answer choice or is this a written responce assignment?
Explanation:
?
Individuals ought to fight as last resort and best while their lifestyles are in coming near danger. a. true
Definition of the last resort: something performed most effectively if nothing else works asking for more time should be our last hotel.
Going into medical institutions is seen as a last resort. As a remaining resort, he became given adrenaline, injected at once into his heart. a solution might be pruning of argument and end result values as an ultimate hotel. The final alternative of doubling again is continually available as a final resort in this sport.
The last resort is something you choose best after you've removed every different opportunity. If each resort and reception hall is booked, a couple can also come to be getting married in their very own outdoor as a final lodge.\
Learn more about last resort here: brainly.com/question/9773712
#SPJ4
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Rosa, who operates a Street Tacos restaurant in her apartment, is charged with criminal violations of the local health and building codes, state license regulations, and federal environmental statutes. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution must
a. persuade three-fourths of the jurors to agree on a guilty verdict. b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict. c. convince the court it is more likely than not that the charges are true d. prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rosa committed every essential element of an offense."
Answer:
b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
When convicting someone for the practice of a criminal offense, the judge imposes the penal sanction that the law provides: penalties of imprisonment, detention, simple imprisonment, restrictive rights and a fine. This conviction has other effects, both criminal and extra-penal. However, for a conviction to be carried out, the judge must reach a conclusion that the defendant is guilty. In order to reach this conclusion, it is necessary to show evidence that proves that the defendant is acting in disagreement with the law and therefore should be punished.
In the case shown in the question, for Rosa to receive a sentence, the charge imposed on her must show evidence as reasonably allowing a guilty verdict.
Answer:
because he locks ..........................
