Answer: $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.
Explanation:
If the MPC = 0.75 and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, then a $115 billion increase in the government expenditures would result in the shift in the aggregate demand curve right by:
= $115 billion ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= $115 billion ÷ 0.25
= $115 billion × 1/0.25
= $115 billion / 0.25
= $460 billion.
Therefore, there'll be a shift in the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator
Answer:
Unsafe food creates a vicious cycle of disease and malnutrition, particularly affecting infants, young children, elderly and the sick. Foodborne diseases impede socioeconomic development by straining health care systems, and harming national economies, tourism and trade.
Answer:
A. Landscape lawns produce positive externality.
B. Sports vehicle generates a positive externality
C. Walk to work creates positive externality.
D. Cigarettes create a negative externality.
Explanation:
Positive externality occurs when society gets benefit from a persons act. Susan has created lawns near her house and there are beautiful flowers in the lawn. This will be relaxing for those who pass near by the lawns. There will be fresh air coming from the lawn and society will look pleasant.
Negative externality is one in which society is harmed by the act of a person. This happens when Anita smokes at a bus stop. There are other travelers who will be present at the bus stop might be harmed from the smoke which arises from the cigarette.
Just think here itll come to you eventually
<span />
Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) They have the opportunity to reject the proposed change.
b) They will have the opportunity to know more than others about the change.
c) They will be able to convince customers the change was the right thing to do.
d) They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
And the correct answer is the option D: They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
Explanation:
To begin with, it will be more acceptable for an employee of a company or a member of a group to agree with a change if that person was involved in the planning of the change. That means that he will feel that he is part of the solution and therefore part of the team because his ideas were listened and maybe he contributed with something. That is why that members who participate in the planning of a change will always be more positive about the final outcome due to the fact that they were there during the process of deciding that outcome and that will make them feel integrity related to the work and to the team as well.
