It would be 6+4, which equals 10. Then, subtract 104 ft minus 10 to get 94 ft in depth.
The probability would be 9/12 or 3/4 in the lowest form
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Equation of a line is given as 
Where,
m = slope of the line = 
b = y-intercept, which is the value at the point where the line intercepts the y-axis. At this point, x = 0.
Let's find m and b to derive the equation for the line.
Use the coordinate pair of any two points on the line. Let's use the following,
=> on the line, when x = 0, y = -2
=> on the line, when x = 4, y = 1
Plug in the values and solve for m
b = -2 (the line intercepts the y-axis at this point)
Our equation would be =>
HL Theorem would prove these two triangles are congruent.
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
