Answer: He actually rode 2 miles per hour on his trip
Step-by-step explanation: Maybe unconventional, but express the time it took, then figure the speed.
Time = distance /speed t will represent time, s is the speed: t = 30/s Use the rime it would have taken at the higher speed to create an equation:
t-12 = 30/s+8 replace the y with the 30/s
30/s -12 = 30/s+8
(s)(30/s -12 ) = (s)(30/s+8 ) Cross multiply to cancel denominators
(s-8)(30 -12s) = (s-8)(30s/s+8 ) ==> 30s +240 -12s² -96s =30s Simplify:
(-1)(-12s² -96s +240 ) =0 ==> 12s² +96s -240 divide all by 12
s² + 8s -20 = 0 Factor and solve for s
(s +10)(s -2) =0 s-2=0 S= 2
Proof:
30/2 = 15 hours for original trip at 2mph,
increase speed by 8mph 2 + 8 = 10mph
30 miles at 10mph takes 3 hours; that is 12 hours less than his actual trip.
(Brainilest, please :-)
9514 1404 393
Answer:
y = -(x+1)^2 +3
Step-by-step explanation:
Translating f(x) left by 1 unit replaces x with x+1.
Translating f(x) up by 3 units replaces f(x) with f(x)+3.
Reflecting f(x) over the x-axis replaces f(x) with -f(x).
__
When y = x^2 is reflected over the x-axis, it becomes ...
y = -x^2
When y = -x^2 is translated 1 unit left, it becomes ...
y = -(x +1)^2
When y = -(x+1)^2 is translated 3 units up, it becomes ...
y = -(x +1)^2 +3
Same slope, different y-intercept
Answer:
B is the answer sorry if it was wrong :)
Step-by-step explanation:
I don’t think functions can have repeating x values
