The correct answer is:
It allowed and encouraged the recruitment of blacks to be soldiers for the U
forces.
Explanation:
It allowed forces to recruit the black males in the Union for the army in that there were many black leaders who were also in favor of this so that there was a possible emancipation of the black population.
They could fight for their own race's right to be free and this would have also given them good monetary recompenses.
This meant that fighting in the war would have given them a better lifestyle after the war and a better life to look forward to.
Answer:
no hehejsanfkjsdnkjsandjnfkdjafxfgdfdffg
Explanation:
The south winning would be a <em>huge</em> issue in itself, and if they continued to use slaves when the Industrial Revolution came around, there wouldn't be a need for slaves, and the vast expansion of the slave trade would shrink by a lot- as the US wouldn't need them.
Here's the problem:
If we're going into counterfactual history, we have to keep a lot of things in mind.
Was the Industrial Revolution sparked because there were no more slaves? If they still had slaves, would it not have been necessary to obtain and invent machines?
Would we be the United States? Would be have gone at war again from the North still being against slavery? Keep these things in mind.
Hopefully this helped!
