Answer: Level 5, groups
Explanation: Macrosociology: Broad processes in society, classes, government, economy, army.
Microsociology: People's actions with one another in society, their beliefs, their feelings values.
The correct answer would be, Gender Identity.
Enrique believes that makes should always be the ones to ask females out on dates. He thinks that if a man accepts an invitation for a date from a girls, it make him a wimp. This is an example of Enrique's Gender Identity.
Explanation:
Gender identity is something like the personal sense about ones own gender. Genders are identified at the time of birth. There are usually two types of genders,
These are the two main genders identified by people.
On the basis of these genders, there are some social roles that have been associated with their sex. For example, bravery and strength is usually associated socially with men, where as shyness, care are being associated with females.
Similarly, Enrique'e gender identity made him think like the way that if any girl asks him to go on a date with her, it would make him a wimp.
Learn more about Gender Identity at:
brainly.com/question/10066036
#LearnWithBrainly
Jo secretly___.
A. Gets two stories published in the newspaper. A is your awnser
Hey there,
The parliament hope to save <span>the British East India Company from ruining by passing the tea act.
Hope this helps :))
~Top
</span>
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
