Why is a variable exponent a number plus a variable adds eg: (x)*+(x) =?

An elevator starts on the 100th floor. It descends 4 floors every 10 seconds. At what floor will the elevator be 60 seconds afte

Artyom0805 [142]

So is 4 floors / 10 seconds
If you have 60 seconds you can multiple 10 by 6 because 10×6=60
so you also have to multiple 4 by 6
4×6=24
and because it's descending it's 100-24= 76

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

HURRY PLEASE I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND LOTS OF POINTS

Mrac [35]

Answer:

$m = \dfrac{3}{4}$

Step-by-step explanation:

We would like to find the slope of the line of the given equation .

$\longrightarrow y =\dfrac{3}{4}x -1$

We know that slope intercept form of the line is given by ,

$\longrightarrow y = mx + c$

where ,

m is the slope
c is y intercept

Now we can compare the given equation with the slope intercept form to find the slope . You will see that 3/4 is present at the place of m .Therefore ,

$\longrightarrow \underline{\underline{m=\dfrac{3}{4}}}$

Hence option C is correct choice .

4 0

2 years ago

Hallie can use the equation p = 4l + 4w + 4h to determine the sum of the lengths of the edges of a rectangular prism. She begins

Zanzabum

The expression Hallie wrote is not clear, because if 0 is the only number that satisfies p = 4l + 4w + 4h = l + w + h.

But if you meant to write:

p = 4l + 4w + 4h

p/4 = l + w + h

then she could get something different.

Answer:

The expression (w + h) + p/4 should follow the subtraction if Hallie's equation is

p = 4l + 4w + 4h

p/4 = l + w + h

h = -

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us solve Hallie's problem.

She can use the equation:

p = 4l + 4w + 4h

to determine the sum of the lengths of the edges of a rectangular prism. Because she begin to solve the equation for h, let us solve for h.

This means we are trying to make h the subject of the formula.

p = 4l + 4w + 4h

When you factor out 4 on the right hand side, you have

p = 4(l + w + h)

Dividing both side by 4, we have

p/4 = l + w + h

Now, subtracting (l + w) from both sides, we have

p/4 - (l + w) = h.

This can be written as:

h = - (l + w) + p/4

And that is what Hallie wanted to obtain.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use the vertical line test to determine if the relation {(–6, –2), (–2, 6), (0, 3), (3, 5)} is a function

hammer [34]

Answer: Its a function

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

At the fair 4 employees were paid $8.75 an hour to work at a funnel cake stand. They worked 8 hours at regular pay then for 5 ho

nordsb [41]

Answer:

$125.25

Step-by-step explanation:

8.75*h+11.25*e

h is hours regular pay and e is extra pay for overtime. Since its an extra $2.50 for overtime, add that to the regular pay. Put in the hours:

$8.75*8+11.25*5$

Simplify by multiplying 8.75 by 8

$70+11.25*5$

Simplify by multiplying 11.25 by 5

$70+56.25$

Add

$70+56.25=126.25$

Since it says how much did each earn, as in individually, leave it as it is (unless regular pay was $2.18 an hour, which would be a rip-off). I'm pretty sure including the number of employees was meant to throw you off.

7 0

3 years ago

Why is a variable exponent a number plus a variable adds eg: (x)*+(x) =?​

Why is a variable exponent a number plus a variable adds eg: (x)*+(x) =?