Answer:
A. It has contributed to job growth.
Explanation:
we can see that more people are getting jobs!
==================================================================
<em>Hope I Helped, Feel free to ask any questions to clarify :)
</em>
<em>
Have a great day!
</em>
<em>
More Love, More Peace, Less Hate.
</em>
<em> -Aadi x</em>
Answer:
The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it. Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard. Parliament responded with a series of harsh measures intended to stifle colonial resistance to British rule; two years later the war began.
<u>Please Give Me BRAINLIEST!!</u>
<u></u>
I believe the Espionage Act may be the answer. The act was passed during the United States' affiliation with WWI. It banned any disloyal language toward the U.S. government. The act has been amended several times however, due to the fact that it violated some constitutional rights.
Answer:
the I-knew-it-all-along phenomenon.
Explanation:
Hindsight bias: Also known as 'the I-knew-it-all-along phenomenon'.
The hindsight bias phenomenon involves the propensity of a person to assume or estimate that he or she already knew the consequence of a particular event after the consequence has formerly been determined.
Example: A person claims that he knew that his friends will not come but later on his friends came and he claims that he knew that the opposite is going to happen.
The correct answer is: "One mental image can have both analogical and symbolic representations".
An analogical representation is a mental image that contains the physical characteristic of the object. For example, a map.
On the other hand, symbolic representations are abstract, as they do not resemble the features of the object. The main example of symbolic representation is writing, which refers to certain realities without using at all its physical features. Another example could be a logo.
<u>Some mental images can be simultaneously analogical and abstract.</u> Imagine a logo of a company. Most logos are totally abstract, as the ones of Nike or Lacoste which do not inform visually that they are related to a clothes brand. On the other hand, a logo can contain some of the physical characteristics of the underlying product/service/activity, such as the one of the WNBA (attached below). It is actually a cartoon which shows a woman playing basketball.
