1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinil7 [7]
2 years ago
11

What is the best way to persuade your teachers.

Law
1 answer:
Eddi Din [679]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: Make them see that your trying hard and that, what ever your asking for, you truly want it. They’ll be more inclined to accept if they think your serious about it.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What decides the winner of a presidential election?
Ksju [112]
A
Ajdhvsheamkabwbshsbevevev
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select two of the offices underneath the jurisdiction of the executive office. National House of Senatorial Privilege, Office of
almond37 [142]

Answer: National House of Senatorial Privilege, Office of Policy Development,

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a useful vehicle feature from a security perspective? (Antiterrorism Scenario Training, Page 4)
Lyrx [107]

Answer i think it could be e

6 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Keith Reed, a 15-year-old male with no prior arrests is brought in for questioning for larceny of several hundred dollars’ worth
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

it's sooo simple but so hard to explain but it's a

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which South African act or law should be removed?
    8·1 answer
  • Assume Mrs. Kinsley has filed a suit against Kitchen Essential Products Inc. for the injuries that she sustained under the theor
    8·1 answer
  • How are judicial activism and judicial review related?
    10·2 answers
  • Men convicted of crimes of passion have ____brain levels
    7·2 answers
  • What if you were a jury member in a case in which a 25-year old professional wrestler is charged with 2nd degree murder for shoo
    12·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLEASEE!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Who is motomoto who who who who
    14·2 answers
  • Where my ladies at?............15 year old boy
    5·2 answers
  • The process of forensic science in criminal justice begins when evidence is found at a crime scene by a _____________.
    9·1 answer
  • Which laws can be combined to form the ideal gas law? Boyle’s law and Charles’s law Gay-Lussac’s law and Avogadro’s law Charles’
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!