A vice-president has a very level of responsibility as well as workload. Often, the people at higher levels have to take risky decisions, and that too in a shorter time. They supervise a large portion of a company.
A human resource person may have a high workload but they don't have to supervise such a significant portion of the company, and they are not responsible for improvising the company, year after year, but a VP is.
<span>Using African people to help European officials administer a colony was known as indirect rule.
</span><span>I hope this helps.
</span>
Humans and the natural biodiversity can have 3 types of relationships whether it is symbiosis, commensalism and or even predation. People can either become friends, enemies or even just become strangers whereby they don't bother each other. The natural ecosystem is filled with life and different organisms are able to live peacefully. But with the presence of humans and their so called productivity of technology, organisms are affected by it. The living organisms migrate or either die, the food chain is destroyed and the competition of resources would increase and there would be a higher death rate of organisms, this would result in the species getting endangered. Due to the changes made by humans the natural biodiversity would be greatly affected, badly
There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did. We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept. Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true. Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.
One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people. Roman religion was based on transactions. If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return. It was like buying something on Amazon. By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe. God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things. Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.
A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code. Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives. The gods did not care how people acted towards one another. The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave. This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.
Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature. The Roman world was very unequal. There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves. The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable. This is where Christianity was so different. It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God. Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.
Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.
Two basic types of markets exist in any market economy: resource markets and product markets. The exchanges that take place in these markets benefit both the households and the firms that engage in exchanges. This lesson will introduce the circular flow of money, resources and goods and services in a market economy.
